Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> 1. Org mode manual itself, just like the other Emacs manuals may need to
> be
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Sławomir Grochowski writes:
>
>> +(defun org-columns-move-up ()
>> + (interactive)
>> ...
>> +(defun org-columns-move-down ()
>> + (interactive)
>> ...
>
> May you also add docstrings?
> And maybe better names would be org-columns-next/previous-line.
> ...
Applied,
Hi Ihor, Jack,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Jack Kamm writes:
>
>> I agree that it would be good to redesign it, but am not sure where to
>> start.
>
> For example,
>
> 1. Change `org-babel-comint-async-register' to return UUID and to store
>PARAMS as passed by the backend (current approach
Zhitao writes:
> This commit is problematic:
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=0a58a53edac955381266e49bd68d1140fbece33e
>
> The old matcher for file+olp+datetree was:
>
> (`(file+olp+datetree ,path . ,outline-path)
> ...
> The new matcher does not match empty
Daniel Clemente writes:
> I also see the warnings. In my case it's because I'm using outline-minor
> mode in an elisp file. I'm not sure it's supported, but it worked years
> ago: ...
It is not supported by Org mode.
The modern outline mode has `outline-cycle'.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Leo Butler writes:
> So, it is *possible* to have the setupfile set-up arbitrary elisp code
> that would be evaluated at some later time (during export or src block
> evaluation, as you wrote)? Is that correct?
Yes. That's why we prompt when SETUPFILE is remote.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
On Mon, Feb 05 2024, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Leo Butler writes:
>
>> Q: if #+setupfile points to a real file available to download, does Org
>> evaluate that file?
>
> keywords and startup options are taken from there. No Elisp code present
> in #+SETUPFILE is evaluated.
>
> That said, if the
I also see the warnings. In my case it's because I'm using outline-minor
mode in an elisp file. I'm not sure it's supported, but it worked years
ago: I could fold and unfold sections with usual org-mode keys like C-tab.
I miss that feature. I never managed to learn the real outline-mode
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.
Jack Kamm writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> What we can do is to introduce a new backend template function
>> org-babel-session-buffer: that will be passed a session name and
>> src block params and return the session buffer name.
>>
>> If such function is not defined, we fall back to
> From: Ihor Radchenko
> Cc: jporterb...@gmail.com, stefankan...@gmail.com, emacs-de...@gnu.org,
> emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 12:38:19 +
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> > I think we do want to allow extending of this, but doesn't
> > thingatpt.el already provide such
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> I think we do want to allow extending of this, but doesn't
> thingatpt.el already provide such capabilities? For example, I see
> this in bounds-of-thing-at-point:
> ...
> (cond
> ((get thing 'bounds-of-thing-at-point)
> (funcall
> From: Ihor Radchenko
> Cc: emacs-de...@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 22:56:05 +
>
> Jim Porter writes:
>
> > On 2/5/2024 7:07 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> >> It would make sense to add a number of alists:
> >> - bounds-of-thing-at-point-provider-alist
> >> - same
14 matches
Mail list logo
