Org mode version 9.7-pre (9.7-pre-n/a-g356072 @ /home/dinko/.config/emacs/elpaca/builds/org/); table alignment broken when using links in cells

Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.

emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Org mode version 9.7-pre (9.7-pre-n/a-g356072; org-table-to-lisp breaks table alignment when using links

After installing latest org from git, table alignment is broken for me in tables where some of the cells contain links for example: | a| b | |--+---| | [[c][c]] | d | Shows like this: | a| b | |--+---| | c | d | Unless I M-x org-toggle-link-display, tested

Re: [proof of concept] inline language blocks

Juan Manuel, I am not against optional arguments. The idea is to make the feature more flexible and convenient for domain-specific documents. I did not use square brackets in my example to concentrate on the use case of concise and clear markup. On 29/02/2024 06:42, Juan Manuel Macías

Things got very slow: profiler output

I rebuilt Org and Emacs from the development trees and something is wrong, because some Org files I use regularly have become incredibly slow to use. I rarely use the profiler and don't know what to make of what it says, but I opened a file and ran it while I moved around and expanded and

Re: [proof of concept] inline language blocks

Max Nikulin writes: > #+options: custom-object(:type la :latex_element foreignlanguage > :latex_pre "{latin}") mmm, I see it as not very flexible and perhaps too complicated for the user. My idea with the concept of inline-special-block is that it is like the inline version of its older

Re: Radio links work only in small numbers

gh). Do you have any indication on how many would be maximum? Thank you. --- [1]: You can also see the benchmark results in the file. https://git.sr.ht/~nobiot/org-radio-links-patch-20240228/tree/main/item/5000-terms.org – nobiot

Re: [PATCH] doc/org-manual.org (Checkboxes): move section 'Checkboxes' from 'TODO Items' to 'Plain Lists'

On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 13:17:54 +0100 Ihor Radchenko wrote --- > Matt m...@excalamus.com> writes: > > > I had responded in favor here: > > https://list.orgmode.org/18d4cf138a6.10fb9c6702382826.5023996590743168...@excalamus.com/ > > Did I miss something... Yes, it appears there's

Re: [PATCH] ob-tangle: Add flag to optionally remove files before writing

Ihor Radchenko writes: > > Thanks for the update! > Unfortunately, your patch has unbalanced parenthesis and will not work. > I have modified your patch to make things work and to make it conform to > Elisp code conventions. I also removed spurious change in the existing > variable. > > See the

Re: [proof of concept] inline language blocks

On 28/02/2024 20:15, Juan Manuel Macías wrote: #+options: inline-special-block-aliases:(("latin" :lang "la" :color blue :prelatex "\\itshape " :html "style=\"font-style:italic;\"")) This is an example of Latin text: &_[@latin@]{lorem ipsum dolor sit amet}. It is more verbose than {lorem

Re: Radio links work only in small numbers

ttps://git.sr.ht/~nobiot/org-radio-links-patch-20240228/tree > > The two files, `500-terms.org` and `5000-terms.org`, contain 500 > and 5000 radio targets respectively. > > Both files have two H1 headlines "Definitions" and "Body text". Once >

Re: Radio links work only in small numbers

iot/org-radio-links-patch-20240228/tree The two files, `500-terms.org` and `5000-terms.org`, contain 500 and 5000 radio targets respectively. Both files have two H1 headlines "Definitions" and "Body text". Once you open the file, call `M-x org-update-radio-targ

Re: [proof of concept] inline language blocks

Max Nikulin writes: > Juan Manuel your ":fr{}" and similar objects is a domain-specific > language that is quite different from a generic element proposed by > Samuel. Do you think it makes sense to modify your inline special > block patch to allow creation of concise DSL? > > Juan Manuel Macías.

Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

Bastien Guerry writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> Bastien, may you please check FSF records? > > Done, and confirmed things are in order. Welcome! Recorded. https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg/commit/4760468a -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at

Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

Ihor Radchenko writes: > Bastien, may you please check FSF records? Done, and confirmed things are in order. Welcome! -- Bastien Guerry

Re: [PATCH] doc/org-manual.org (Checkboxes): move section 'Checkboxes' from 'TODO Items' to 'Plain Lists'

Matt writes: > I had responded in favor here: > https://list.orgmode.org/18d4cf138a6.10fb9c6702382826.5023996590743168...@excalamus.com/ Did I miss something, or did you not provided arguments /why/ the section should be moved? I need to understand what kind of improvement it would provide to

Re: org-mode: example blocks are no longer syntax highlighted in emacs

Max Nikulin writes: >>> After upgrading to emacs 29.2 and org 9.7, my example blocks are no longer >>> syntax highlighted in emacs. >> >> Yet, there is no reason to remote it. >> I recovered example block fontification on main. > > At least some people are against the feature: > >

Re: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never increases their number

Tim Ruffing writes: > On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 12:49 +, Ihor Radchenko wrote: >> However, your total contributions are now at the limit we can legally >> accept without FSF copyright assignment. >> Would you consider doing copyright paperwork as described in >>

Re: [PATCH] org-babel-demarcate-block: split using element API

gerard.vermeu...@posteo.net writes: >> You may wrap `org-indent-block' into `condition-case' to catch >> user-errors. > > The caveat is not a real constraint, since Org has limited support for > source block editing in an Org mode buffer when an > `org-babel-edit-prep:' function signals an

Re: [PATCH] ob-tangle: Add flag to optionally remove files before writing

[ Moving the discussion back to public in Org mailing list ] Olivier Lischer writes: > I hope that this time I have changed the patch the way you wanted it. > If anything is still wrong, I am happy to improve it. Thanks for the update! Unfortunately, your patch has unbalanced parenthesis and

Re: Provide sane default for the @direntry

Stefan Monnier writes: > When exporting to Texinfo, the patch below makes it easier to generate > a good `@direntry` by using sane defaults. > For most files, you'll just need > > #+TEXINFO_DIR_CATEGORY: {my-category} > > I believe it also makes it a bit harder to shoot oneself in the foot

Re: [proof of concept] inline language blocks

On 22/02/2024 06:02, Juan Manuel Macías wrote: Samuel Wales writes: :fr{some text in French} being expressed as $[lang :fr "bonjour"] To expand a little more... Another problem I see in your example is nesting. In my proposal, the blocks can be nested: :fr{text in French and :it{text in

Re: Asynchronous blocks for everything (was Re: [BUG] Unexpected result when evaluating python src block asynchronously [9.7-pre (release_9.6.17-1131-gc9ed03.dirty @ /home/yantar92/.emacs.d/straight/b

Hi Matt, Matt writes: > On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 17:42:54 +0100 Bruno Barbier > > > I'll publish a branch soon; it will be a major rewrite of my current > > proposal. It should be less confusing and, I hope, address some of your > > comments. > > > > Thanks again for your questions

Pending contents in org documents (Re: Asynchronous blocks for everything (was Re: ...))

Hi, Bruno Barbier writes: > Hi Matt, [...] >> Since this thread is dedicated to blocking, let me share my thoughts on that >> subject. > > I guess I should start a new thread then :) I finally got a new version. I've renamed the proposed feature "pending contents", that is, some contents