Stephen Eglen <s.j.eg...@damtp.cam.ac.uk> writes: > Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Stephen, >> >> I think this is actually a bug. Since the command is called ...- >> iswitchb, >> I am sure the intention was to use iswitchbe. Later, when we added ido >> support as well, the function was rewritten using >> org-icompleting-read, and in this way the iswitchb support was lost. > > p.s. one day I might imagine that iswitchb.el might disappear and be > replaced by ido.el, which might make life easier, assuming that iswitchb > hasn't diverged too much since Kim first made ido.el.
I haven't really followed iswitchb developments since I branched ido from it (many full moons ago), so I don't know how much they have diverted since them. I may have added some stuff on request from users, but that was also a long time ago... > > What do you think Kim - should we just have ido.el in the emacs >sources, and have iswitchb-mode configure ido.el to just do buffer >searching? This sounds like a good idea - but I don't have time to look at it anytime soon. I guess the main task (besides migrating any newer features of iswitchb to ido) is to find out which ido settings should be used for iswitchb customizations. > > (Sorry Kim, this is a thread on emacs-orgmode, > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/26723) > > best wishes, Stephen > > -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
