[Orgmode] [feature request] one more store location for remember note

hi all I really enjoy by "use last location to store remember note" feature introduced recently (thanks, Carsten!). just want to propose one more (similar) thing: quite usually I'd like to store the note not exactly to the same subtree as last one, but somewhere nearby, like this: * Papers ** jou

[Orgmode] Re: how to "untag" subtree?

Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Oct 5, 2007, at 13:54, Maxim Loginov wrote: >> >> is there any mechanism to untag subtree? > > No, that is not possible. As a work-around, can create an > additonal tag "nopython" and then craft your s

[Orgmode] how to "untag" subtree?

is not related to python and I do not want to have tag :python: on this subtree! is there any mechanism to untag subtree? thanks Maxim Loginov ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-or

[Orgmode] Re: insert item under previous headline (feature request?)

Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know about inserting "the last used headline" but it would > certainly be useful to be able to call the last used *template*. this is good idea as well, I vote for this also ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list

[Orgmode] Re: insert item under previous headline (feature request?)

Xavier Maillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Isn't this already covered by remember templates ? not really... there are variables org-remember-default-headline and org-default-notes-file but you need manually change them, it would be good to keep the position of last inserted TODO in org-remembe

[Orgmode] insert item under previous headline (feature request?)

hi all It is often necessary to insert several similar TODO under one header, like: * TODO read papers ** TODO paper 1 ** TODO paper 2 ** TODO paper 3 usually I look for the paper in internet and use remember to insert such TODOs, and temporarily modify remember template in order not to seek "*

[Orgmode] Re: [bug-report] inserting link to a target with non-ascii symbols

hmmm.. the bug is not always repeatable... sometimes link is inserted, sometimes not. now try to figure out exact conditions ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

[Orgmode] [bug-report] inserting link to a target with non-ascii symbols

hi Carsten I found a bug related to inserting links to the target written in native language. if I have a header with target like this (in Russian): * TODO <<сделать что-то>> then I want to make a link to this target: 1. C-c l on header (here ok) 2. go to place where to want to make link and C-c

[Orgmode] log entries order question (feature request?)

hi all I prefer to log activity when doing something with project and set (setq org-log-done '(state)) in my ~/.emacs. Usually I change TODO state several times during project completition and every change the new log entry appeared on top, just after header. It is more natural to add them at th

[Orgmode] bbdb keywords in remenber template

hi all can anybody explain how %:name keyword is working in remember template? using this keyword in the template is not expanded, but produce only %:name string. let's say I have: (setq org-remember-templates '((?p "* %:name"))) is that incorrect usage or bug? thanks Maxim _

[Orgmode] Re: auto description of file link feature request

Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You can just leave the description empty. yes, but then you'll see link like "file:~/dir/file" instead just "~/dir/file" second option looks nicer and more consistent with C-c C-l behavior > On Jul 9, 2007, at

[Orgmode] auto description of file link feature request

hi all when you insert a link to a file with C-u C-c C-l you have to enter Description manually. is that possible to substitute empty Description string with the path just entered? it works in this way if you insert previously saved link with C-c C-l best Maxim

[Orgmode] Re: Org-mode version 5.01

hi Carsten very nice job! I'm impressed by properties a lot! some comments/improvement suggestions: > There are important changes, so unless you plan to read the manual > in the near future, I'd advise you carefully read the notes below. addition Changes subsection into info with hyperlinks to r

[Orgmode] fill in *Org Note* buffer

hi again :-) how to set auto-fill-mode with fill-column or fill-paragraph-function locally for the *Org Note* buffer in a proper way? this buffer appears when the state for a task is changed (let's say TODO-DONE) and allow to make notes (really useful!). this note can be quite long and it will loo

[Orgmode] timeline questions (feature request?)

hi all! 1. is that possible to do a timeline agenda view for selected or all agenda-files? so you can see how your project are overlapped in time, this might help to plan your timetable more naturally. 2. usually I put inactive timestamps everywhere (created todo items, todo state changes, remar

[Orgmode] font color for inactive timestamp

is it possible to change it and to make them different from active? I'd prefer to see inactive timestamps in gray color and active in blue for example thanks Maxim ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li

[Orgmode] bug report: body-tag confusion

hi all I found, if put word between colons in the body, it will be prompted for tag completion, when you hit C-c C-c on header. lets say, you have: ** TODO test hm :bla: hm then "bla" will appear in tag completion list. but it is not fully functional tag: you cannot find this body in agenda

[Orgmode] bug report: global tags completion in agenda

is not changed. basically, if you just run emacs without any tag editing/aligning/whatever, you'll see empty completion list. I'm using emacs-22.1 and org-mode-4.79 best Maxim Loginov ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org htt

[Orgmode] feature request: tags in remember template

etion thanks Maxim Loginov ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

[Orgmode] Re: sparse tree by C-u C-c C-v suggestion

Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jun 9, 2007, at 8:50, Maxim Loginov wrote: > >> it would be good if sparse tree created by C-u C-c C-v take >> not a numerical argument, but string from org-todo-keywords >> with auto completion. > > This is exac

[Orgmode] sparse tree by C-u C-c C-v suggestion

hi all it would be good if sparse tree created by C-u C-c C-v take not a numerical argument, but string from org-todo-keywords with auto completion. So you do not need to keep in mind org-todo-keywords variable best Maxim ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing l

[Orgmode] Re: target-links (backlink) relation and global radio targets

Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> the target occurs. is it possible to implement this with special >> agenda view? > > Not a special agenda view, but you can use `org-occur' > to create the corresponding sparse tree. > > In your example: > >C-c / \[project A\] RET > thanks, I'll

[Orgmode] Re: make targets look nicer

Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I believe that some highlighting will be necessary to show that this > is a target. Could be font-lock, but could also just be << and >>. > Don't you want to be able to see that something is a target Of course it is good to see targets, but I do n

[Orgmode] make targets look nicer

I use a lot of explicit targets with angle braces <>, but usually I do not put them into comments leaving them inline. these braces stress the attention on the target when read the sentence, it is not always desired. maybe it is possible to hide them similarly to "Clean view" but without spaces?

[Orgmode] target-links (backlink) relation and global radio targets

I'm wondering if it is possible to see the all links from the target? for example, I have project B depending on project A like this: #+SEQ_TODO: TODO NEXT WAITING DONE * TODO project A # <> * WAITING project B project is waiting completion of [[project A]] when the project A is finished I'd l

[Orgmode] tags: thoughts, questions and feature request

I like tags very much, everything should be tagged, not hierarchical! :-) but in org-mode these to approaches are well balanced and I suppose to use tags extensively. in the following there is a description how I suppose to use tags together with questions and features I did not find. any comments