Re: [O] face-at-point

2013-06-15 Thread Michael Sperber
Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es writes: The issue is that org-7 shipped its own outline version for org mode called noutline, I don't know why it disappear, so I simply copied noutline into the org-8 directory added a (require 'noutline) to org.el That's because XEmacs's outline.el is now

Re: [O] XEmacs and ert

2012-09-01 Thread Michael Sperber
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes: Michael Sperber writes: I've attached a patch (1 out of 3) that's minimally needed to make the current org-mode work on XEmacs. While we have you here… Do you know of a version of ert that is compatible with XEmacs? The roadblock I've run

[O] PATCH[1/3]: Activate `org-self-insert-cluster-for-undo' in XEmacs

2012-08-30 Thread Michael Sperber
: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:35:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] XEmacs: Default `org-self-insert-cluster-for-undo' also on XEmacs. 2012-08-25 Michael Sperber m...@xemacs.org * org.el (org-self-insert-cluster-for-undo): Default `org-self-insert-cluster-for-undo' also on XEmacs. --- lisp/org.el |3

[O] PATCH[2/3]: Make call to `fill-paragraph' work on XEmacs.

2012-08-30 Thread Michael Sperber
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] XEmacs: Default `org-self-insert-cluster-for-undo' also on XEmacs. 2012-08-25 Michael Sperber m...@xemacs.org * org.el (org-self-insert-cluster-for-undo): Default `org-self-insert-cluster-for-undo' also on XEmacs. --- lisp/org.el |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions

[O] PATCH[3/3]: org-element.el: Remove illegal t clause in case

2012-08-30 Thread Michael Sperber
This patch (written by Mats Lidell) fixes an error we saw on XEmacs, but we think it's a bug on GNU Emacs, too. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla From 516456845f93d2ef7f05c6f7789f8ff4e368f6f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mats Lidell ma...@xemacs.org Date:

[O] PATCH[2/3]: Make call to `fill-paragraph' work on XEmacs. [THIS IS THE PATCH]

2012-08-30 Thread Michael Sperber
to `fill-paragraph' work on XEmacs. 2012-08-25 Michael Sperber m...@xemacs.org (org-fill-paragraph): Pass optional argument to `fill-paragraph', which is mandatory for XEmacs. --- lisp/org.el |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el

Re: [O] PATCH[3/3]: org-element.el: Remove illegal t clause in case

2012-08-30 Thread Michael Sperber
Bastien b...@altern.org writes: Hi Michael and Mats, Michael Sperber sper...@deinprogramm.de writes: This patch (written by Mats Lidell) fixes an error we saw on XEmacs, but we think it's a bug on GNU Emacs, too. Thank you both for the patch! I just applied it. I changed the commit

Re: [O] missing autoloads / (void-variable org-version)

2012-04-29 Thread Michael Sperber
it as soon as possible. Towards that end, I can test Emacs23 and Emacs24 on Linux. Anyone still using XEmacs and willing to check that everything keeps working there? Michael Sperber is our XEmacs fairy around, hopefully he we be able to test the patch. Yes. I've also had to apply a few

[O] Only use `visual-line-mode if it's bound`[WAS: Current patches for XEmacs]

2012-04-07 Thread Michael Sperber
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Can you send each patch in a separate email using `git format-patch'? Attached. The second one will follow shortly. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla From 18a83ce61fb420e85987e77f8506c01023a22c16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

[O] Fix bug in `org-footnote-normalize' [WAS: Current patches for XEmacs]

2012-04-07 Thread Michael Sperber
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Can you send each patch in a separate email using `git format-patch'? Here's the second one. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla From b088bfff32d024ec67fcf8ee0812244128198d93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mike Sperber

[O] Current patches for XEmacs

2012-04-05 Thread Michael Sperber
https://github.com/mikesperber/org-mode has two patches for org-mode that are needed to get org-mode superficially working on XEmacs: https://github.com/mikesperber/org-mode/commit/18a83ce61fb420e85987e77f8506c01023a22c16 * org.el (org-kill-line): Access `visual-line-mode' only if it's

Re: [O] org-capture and XEmacs, indenting too far

2011-10-23 Thread Michael Sperber
Michael Sperber sper...@deinprogramm.de writes: Robert Pluim rpl...@gmail.com writes: Hi, I'm using XEmacs 21.5 (beta29) garbanzo d27c1ee1943b+ [Lucid] (i686-pc-cygwin, Mule) of Mon Oct 18 2010 on RPluim, with the following org-capture-templates ((t Todo entry (file+headline ~/org

Re: [O] Current patches to make org-mode run on XEmacs

2011-10-22 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi Michael, I have checked these in, with the following exceptions: Thanks. One bit slipped through: diff --git a/lisp/ob-calc.el b/lisp/ob-calc.el index 14d7d5d..44ed82b 100644 --- a/lisp/ob-calc.el +++ b/lisp/ob-calc.el @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@

Re: [O] org-capture and XEmacs, indenting too far

2011-10-22 Thread Michael Sperber
Robert Pluim rpl...@gmail.com writes: Hi, I'm using XEmacs 21.5 (beta29) garbanzo d27c1ee1943b+ [Lucid] (i686-pc-cygwin, Mule) of Mon Oct 18 2010 on RPluim, with the following org-capture-templates ((t Todo entry (file+headline ~/org/notes.org Tasks) * TODO %?)) The problem is that for

[O] Current patches to make org-mode run on XEmacs

2011-08-31 Thread Michael Sperber
... are attached. I've run with this for a few weeks now, and what I use mostly works. So I would appreciate if these could go into the git repo. Let me draw your attention to this hunk: --- a/lisp/org.el +++ b/lisp/org.el @@ -7360,7 +7360,7 @@ would end up with no indentation after the

Re: [O] xemacs error when calling org-install

2011-08-14 Thread Michael Sperber
Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7...@public.gmane.org writes: Hi Volker and David, David Maus wrote: At Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:06:19 +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: Under xemacs when calling the following from org-mode-7.3 I get: (require 'org-install) - Wrong number of

[O] Can I put | in a table cell?

2011-04-17 Thread Michael Sperber
SSIA. I'm sure this is answered in an obvious place, but I couldn't find it. Quoting so I'd get correct export rendering would be sufficient. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

[O] Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-agenda: rewrite mode-line

2011-03-05 Thread Michael Sperber
Bastien b...@altern.org writes: Hi, Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: I like the patch, but since it is not critical it remains on ice until :eval is supported by XEmacs. Michael, it would be nice if you could put :eval into XEmacs so that we can use this improved code

[O] Re: xemacs21: void-variable macro-declaration-function

2011-02-28 Thread Michael Sperber
Andreas Goesele goes...@hfph.mwn.de writes: I had a working org-mode version 6.33trans with XEmacs 21.4.22 and wanted to move to a newer version. I installed org-mode 7.01g-1 0 coming with debian squeeze. But now org-mode doesn't work any more. When I open any org-mode file I get: File

[Orgmode] [PATCH] Fix minor glitches on XEmacs

2010-12-22 Thread Michael Sperber
I had to apply this patch to make things work on XEmacs. First hunk: `calc-trail' does not appear to be used in `ob-calc' Second hunk: This seems to be a genuine bug (I don't see a '+' syntax class on GNU Emacs, either), and this is just my guess as to the fix. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede,

Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-agenda: rewrite mode-line

2010-12-21 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi XEmacs users I am about to apply this patch, but I am still wondering if :eval in the mode line is working on XEmacs? Sorry, missed that one: XEmacs does not currently have :eval. This might be a good reason to add it to XEmacs, but it

Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: On Oct 24, 2010, at 7:28 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote: Regarding Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose- region is not known; Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com adds: Hi Uwe, Does the latest Org-mode git version work for you

Re: [Orgmode] Re: 7.01 Xemacs 21.4.22: decompose-region is not known

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: But I believe you told me that this outline.el has provide statements for both outline and noutline, right? Yes. But if it's not loaded yet, you need to call it by outline. (I.e. it's in file outline.el, not noutline.el.) -- Cheers =8-}

[Orgmode] Re: org-freemind.el and rx

2010-10-14 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Hi Lennart, I am trying to keep org-mode also workable with XEmacs. One problem here is that XEmacs does not have rx. Would you object if I replace the rx macro calls with the string representations of the regular expressions in

Re: [Orgmode] org-babel and Xemacs incompatibilities

2010-06-07 Thread Michael Sperber
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: I've replaced the calls to `line-number-at-pos' with a single call to `count-lines'. Is count lines (also part of simple.el) also missing from xemacs? No, `count-lines' should work. Thanks for the other changes! -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede,

Re: [Orgmode] org-babel and Xemacs incompatibilities

2010-06-07 Thread Michael Sperber
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes: And two more o Symbol's function definition is void: assoc-default when trying to display an image [...] o Symbol's function definition is void: make-temp-file when using org-babel-dot [...] Both of these are in XEmacs 21.5, but not 21.4.

[Orgmode] PATCH: Xemacs incompatibilities

2010-05-24 Thread Michael Sperber
Dr. Volker Zell dr.volker.z...@oracle.com writes: o XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22) Instant Classic [Lucid] (i686-pc-cygwin, Mule) of Sat Jan 31 2009 on vzell-de Ah ... OK, this is a 21.4 issue. The attached patch fixes it. `write-contents-hooks' is not buffer-local by default in 21.4, which is

[Orgmode] PATCH: Fix minor XEmacs compatibility issue

2010-05-24 Thread Michael Sperber
I'd appreciate if this one could be applied. I'll fix XEmacs to accept #Bbinary in the future, but I'd appreciate this one anyway. Doesn't really add complexity ... -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla diff --git a/lisp/org-id.el b/lisp/org-id.el index

Re: [Orgmode] Xemacs incompatibilities

2010-05-24 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: On May 17, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Michael Sperber wrote: In particular, fixing the require won't be enough: org-babel-python.el uses `run-python' and interacts with the inferior Python, whereas python-mode.el defines `py-shell'. Should I try

Re: [Orgmode] Xemacs incompatibilities

2010-05-17 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: This is a really non-standard way for a mode definition which I guess should be fixed in XEmacs. I have made that change anyway. Eric or Dan, please note this change I made in the Babel sources. As someone else pointed out, python-mode.el

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs

2010-05-07 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: any progress with integrating noutline.el into XEmacs? Yes: I've tweaked it (and its dependents) appropriately, committed it to the packages repository, and it's now in pre-release. My intention was to e-mail you as soon as there was an

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs

2010-04-23 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: 4. Can you make XEmacs understand mouse-3 instead of button3 ? Or maybe it does understand these by now? It actually does this now. I've attached a patch that eliminates the relevant featurep conditionals. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede,

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs

2010-04-19 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: The compromise for me would be this: - You fix the things above. - I leave the rest of the necessary compatibility code in - I program any new features with whatever is available in Emacs 22/23 and rely on you to make it XEmacs

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs

2010-04-19 Thread Michael Sperber
One more thing: Are patches like this one acceptable? (Needed to make yesterday's checkout work on XEmacs) diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el index 7cad962..5cca11e 100644 --- a/lisp/org.el +++ b/lisp/org.el @@ -17743,7 +17743,7 @@ the functionality can be provided as a fall-back.)

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs

2010-04-19 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: That is acceptable - but I think that making BUFFER default to (current-buffer) does make a lot of sense - which is why making that argument optional in XEmacs is a good idea anyway. It would - but the problem is that in XEmacs, an omitted

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs

2010-04-18 Thread Michael Sperber
Hi Carsten, many thanks for your e-mail! (And many thanks for your work on org-mode, which is the best piece of software I've started using for a few years.) Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: However, I have recently more and more the feeling how having to cater for several

[Orgmode] Re: Support (or not) for Emacs 21, and XEmacs

2010-04-17 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: If you object to such a development, please step into this discussion. I do - I'm an avoid org-mode user, an XEmacs maintainer. and I'd be happy to help support XEmacs, if that would help change your mind. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede,

[Orgmode] Re: Do we still have XEmacs users?

2009-10-10 Thread Michael Sperber
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Do we still have XEmacs users around here? Yes. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to