Hi Bastien,
Bastien writes:
> Nick Daly writes:
>
>> +(org-babel-plantuml-post-process out-file)
>
> Note that I had to remove the line above from your second patch.
>
> Can you confirm it is not necessary for your second patch to work?
Yes, I can confirm that
CS Suehs wrote:
> Should I expect the setting on the BEGIN_SRC line to work?
On v9.1.14, this works for me as expected:
#+name: helloworld2-works-fine-on-9-1-14
#+BEGIN_SRC plantuml :cache yes :file helloworld2.png
@startuml
Hello --> World
@enduml
#+END_SRC
It
Nick Daly writes:
> Please see the attached patch that allows for post-processing of
> PlantUML diagrams based on the exported file extension.
If the above patch was too generic and heavy-weight for consideration,
please see this alternative, simpler, patch. It just adds a flag that
CS Suehs writes:
> Should I expect PlantUML source blocks and their resulting images to
> be cached and respect `:cache true` ?
Yes.
> In my experience they regenerate every export, even with :cache true.
Can you provide an example?
This example caches correctly for me on v9.1.14.
mails never appeared on the list.
Thanks for your time,
Nick
>From 527610e8a415a45bffac53b9b508b472311627c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Daly
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 21:48:03 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ob-plantuml: Add PlantUML block post-processing.
* lisp/ob-plantuml.el (org-babel-plan
Hi Kyle, thank you again for your help and analysis. In summary,
org-mode needs no patches, but inf-haskell's comint-prompt-regexp
needs updates. I'll follow up with the inf-haskell maintainers.
> inf-haskell used to set comint-prompt-regexp in the body of
> inferior-haskell-mode... This
John Kitchin writes:
> Has anyone had any success in creating or using any kind of virtual
> machine that can work across platforms to run emacs+org-mode?
Yes, just this spring. I was trying to design an experiment that
could be replicated and expanded by any citizen scientist, with
minimal
Apologies, one last patch.
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 7:02 PM Nick Daly wrote:
> : "^\\*?[[:upper:]][\\._[:alnum:]]*\\(?:
> \\*?[[:upper:]][\\._[:alnum:]]*\\)*\\( λ\\)?> "
>
> =comint-prompt-regexp='s variable documentation calls out much simpler
> regexps
>
> :
Hi Kyle, thanks for the thoughtful analysis.
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:51 AM Kyle Meyer wrote:
> So it looks like the member call above is returning nil because the
> prompt markers are corrupting the element. If that's the case, it seems
> like the output cleansing should happen upstream of
Hi Org Maintainers,
Attached is an updated patch that makes output trimming work with
blocks that do and don't produce results. The old patch creates a
=let: Wrong type argument: arrayp, nil= error when evaluating blocks
that don't produce output. This necessarily incorporates yesterday's
Hi Org Maintainers,
Please see the attached patch to remove "Prelude> " and "Prelude| " line
continuations from the block result output when parsing blocks that contain
multi-line function declarations.
This likely requires yesterday's patch to return value-type results from
Haskell blocks.
Hello Org Maintainers,
This issue has been reproduced on org versions 9.1.14 and Git master,
and comes with a patch.
* Issue
ob-haskell.el::org-babel-execute:haskell produces spurious error
messages when running haskell blocks without =:results output=
specified. If =:results= is not specified
Nick Daly wrote:
Hi folks, I have a situation where I have many named code snippets
currently available in external files, and would like to tangle them
into an Org mode file.
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
The following function works for me on a simple example file...
Thank
Hi Bastien,
Nick Daly wrote:
Hi folks, I have a situation where I have many named code snippets
currently available in external files, and would like to tangle them
into an Org mode file.
Bastien writes:
I'm not the one who would undertake this, so my opinion on this should
not matter
Hi folks, I have a situation where I have many named code snippets
currently available in external files, and would like to tangle them
into an Org mode file. Is it currently possible to tangle included
files? If not, could that feature be added to a new version of Org
mode? I've looked through
Hi all, please let me know if the attached minimal example doesn't
come through for whatever reason.
It looks like (org-agenda-to-appt) displays a todo item on its
deadline date at the scheduled time, if the scheduled and deadline
dates are different (and the deadline has no time). The expected
First, Bastien (and everybody), thanks for all the work done on the
8.0 release. It's wonderful, aside from the occasional bug :)
Second, that occasional bug: Priority-down (and presumably,
priority-up) in the org-agenda-sorting-strategy prevent further
sorting from occurring in the weekly/daily
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
celose...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Regarding this: http://orgmode.org/manual/Batch-execution.html
I also had success using --script, as in:
#!/Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/MacOS/Emacs --script
In the top of a .el file. You can
18 matches
Mail list logo
