Re: Radio links work only in small numbers

2024-02-29 Thread Noboru Ota
Ihor Radchenko writes: > org-target-link-regexp does not matter in this case. For this long > regexps I introduced a new variable org-target-link-regexps that > contains a list of shorter regexps. This list is used instead of > org-target-link-regexp. Ah! Thank you. If it is valid to compare (l

Re: Radio links work only in small numbers

2024-02-29 Thread Noboru Ota
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Thanks for testing! > Applied, onto main. > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=341a01a07 > Fixed. You're very welcome. This is amazing. Thank you so much. I have rebased the source to the latest main and also tested with 10,000 dummy entries.

Re: Radio links work only in small numbers

2024-02-28 Thread Noboru Ota
Ihor Radchenko writes: > You need Www. > The attached version of the patch should work for 5000-terms.org. Thank you, Ihor. With your advice, I have managed to apply the patch. It works for 5000 terms! Thank you. Some observations: - Running `org-update-radio-target-regexp` takes about 15 seco

Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-10 Thread Noboru Ota
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Try to open the attached file and run M-x org-transclusion-add-all Thank you. I see. Not even org-transclusion-add-all but a single add function takes a bit of time. If I may ask some questions and for some advice: 1. I see it as an issue rather of recursive transclusi

Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-06 Thread Noboru Ota
Ihor Radchenko writes: > org-transclusion uses with-silent-modifications > macro, which prevents org-element-cache from working properly. I > recommend dropping with-silent-modifications or at least using > combine-after-change-calls. Thank you for this information; I had no idea. Let me look i

Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-06 Thread Noboru Ota
Tim Cross writes: > thank you for making such a valuable contribution. I think your package > will be a valuable addition and it is great you have gone that extra > distance to sign the FSF copyright paperwork and are willing to do the > work to add it into ELPA. > > I'm not 100% certain, but I t

Re: transclusion, tangling, flycheck/flymake, etc.

2021-11-06 Thread Noboru Ota
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Greg Minshall writes: > >> my thought about flycheck, flymake, whatever, is that (optionally) a >> silent, background, =tangle= and/or =<> expansion= would take >> place to produce a "full source file buffer"[*], then the narrowed >> version of that (corresponding to the

Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-06 Thread Noboru Ota
Ihor Radchenko writes: > I noticed that you are using overlays in text-clone. It may potentially > cause slowdown in large Org buffers. Of course, it does not mean that > org-transclusion should not be accepted. Just something that may be > optimised. Karl Voit (GitHub user name, novoid) gave me

Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-06 Thread Noboru Ota
Timothy writes: > Hi Tim, > >> I feel it is functionality which will be used by a subset of users >> or by others only occasionally. Tim, thank you for your feedback. Timothy, thank you for forwarding Tim's feedback into the loop. I think this assessment is fair and reflects the current usage

Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-05 Thread Noboru Ota
Sorry that this email is duplicate for Uwe but I didn't include the mailing list as the To/Cc list. Still getting used to how this mailing list works. Uwe Brauer writes: > Ok I tried that out, both files are indeed org file (I thought that is > the most natural way anyhow) Thank you. > I fin

Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-05 Thread Noboru Ota
Uwe Brauer writes: > 1. I can export main.org to say latex and that latex file includes >the corresponding content of Russell. Sorry, Uwe, I didn't say anything about the first qustion in my previous reply. Yes, that's the idea. The copied text exists in the buffer visiting main.or

Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-05 Thread Noboru Ota
Timothy writes: > It’s worth noting that currently Org’s minimum supported Emacs version is 25. > Do > you use much from Emacs 26/27? There was mention of compat.el earlier though, > and if that goes somewhere this may not be an issue. Thank you, Timothy. I take it that support for version 25

Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-05 Thread Noboru Ota
Uwe Brauer writes: > If I include the content of another org file (say Russell) into my > main.org file > > 1. I can export main.org to say latex and that latex file includes >the corresponding content of Russell. > 2. It is a one way bridge, I cannot modify the content of Russell

Re: Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-01 Thread Noboru Ota
"Thomas Paulsen" writes: > Hi, > > it isn't part of gnu emacs currently. Yes, this is correct. Org-transclusion is only available on GitHub at the moment. With the advice from Ihor and others, I am in the process of sending the whole package as a patch to Org.

Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-01 Thread Noboru Ota
Juan Manuel Macías writes: > I installed your package a few months ago and I have to say that it > works quite well, although I have not had, at the moment, the > opportunity to make intensive use of it. What I can say is that the > concept seems very interesting to me. Very nice package. Thank

Re: Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-11-01 Thread Noboru Ota
Ihor Radchenko writes: > > Welcome ;) > Thank you. > You have my +100500 to have this package as part of Org :D Thank you again :) Is there anything I can/should do to make this happen? I would be happy to email the whole package as a "patch" for code review, if this were the way but I feel th

Introducing Org-transclusion

2021-10-30 Thread Noboru Ota
Hi everyone, This is my first post to Org mailing list. I would like to introduce an add-on package I have been developing for about one year and ask for discussion / advice. The package is named "Org-transclusion", and is available on GitHub at https://github.com/nobiot/org-transclusion. Simpl