> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021, Marco Wahl wrote:
> Possibly a split of function org-make-manuals in org-make-manual and
> org-make-guide and further create two single targets instead of the
> current double target is more clear.
> See the patch.
> WDYT?
Sure, that's much cleaner. (I didn't dare to
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012, Jambunathan K wrote:
BTW, maybe one could think about supporting DESTDIR? That should be
trivial to implement, simply prepend $(DESTDIR) to all destination
paths in the install-* make targets. I can prepare a patch if this
is wanted.
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012, Achim Gratz wrote:
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
(org-odt-styles-dir-list, org-odt-schema-dir-list): New
variables. Pay specific attention to (eval-when-compile ...)
form through which Makefile's $(datadir) - contained in
`org-odt-data-dir' - gets
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012, Bastien wrote:
It would be wonderful if you could provide a patch (and a usage
note).
Included below.
Please add more explanations in such patches -- Jambunathan's
explanations are a model of clarity and detailfulness.
Sorry. Please find an updated patch below.
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012, Bastien wrote:
ps: Makefiles are beyond my jurisdiction. I will let Bastien act
on your patch(es).
Looks like my earlier patch hasn't been applied for 7.8.03. :(
Yes -- things are not entirely clear to me in this area, and the
ongoing discussion between you, Achim
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011, Jambunathan K wrote:
Let know how things go.
Looks like the current git head is working fine.
Sorry, I was a bit too fast with my reply. In fact, things are still
broken.
The problem is that when building org-odt.elc
destination
paths in the install-* make targets. I can prepare a patch if this is
wanted.
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/DESTDIR.html
Cheers,
Ulrich
From f6eb5150418bfd5de35b8f4f9ca39f4cbff1d40b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2012 21
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011, Jambunathan K wrote:
I have pushed a fix so that make install will do the right
thing. Package maintainers have to modify just the $(lispdir) and
$(datadir) vars in the Makefile. (Hopefully) They don't have to do
anything special at all.
Hi Jambunathan,
So you're
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Achim Gratz wrote:
IMHO, an _installed_ org mode should never heuristically search
any support files -- the location should either be recorded into
org-install.el as a constant or made configurable as a defcustom,
whichever is more appropriate.
Such heuristic searches
Hi,
In Gentoo we have an issue with the location of the OpenDocument style
files, reported to us in bug 396269 [1].
When org-mode is installed as a separate Gentoo package, its lisp
files are installed in /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-mode/.
According to our policy, non-lisp files would go to
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Jambunathan K wrote:
According to our policy, non-lisp files would go to
/usr/share/emacs/etc/org-mode/. We would pass this as the etcdir
parameter to make install, so the odt style files would be
installed in stylesdir = /usr/share/emacs/etc/org-mode/styles/.
Hi,
Org-mode 6.11 (earlier versions too) fails to build with the current
CVS Emacs:
emacs -batch -q -eval (progn (add-to-list (quote load-path)
(expand-file-name \./lisp/\)) (add-to-list (quote load-path)
\/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp\)) -f batch-byte-compile
lisp/org-publish.el
12 matches
Mail list logo
