alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes on Sat 9 Jul 2022 08:10:
>
> > the examples I found on this mailing list did not work for me).
>
> I think I now understand why this was so: because latexmk was not
> installed on my system. In this case the docstring of
>
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes on Sat 9 Jul 2022 08:10:
> the examples I found on this mailing list did not work for me).
I think I now understand why this was so: because latexmk was not
installed on my system. In this case the docstring of
org-latex-pdf-process says that
Its value is
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 13:36, John Kitchin wrote:
> Maybe it is still needed so the tooltip looks nice.
currently, oc-basic.el contains the single activation (fontification)
processor (called "basic") shipped with Org, the other oc-*.el files
provide only export processors.
best wishes,
Maybe it is still needed so the tooltip looks nice.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 7:15 AM András Simonyi
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 at 09:17, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>
> > AFAIU, oc-natbib/oc-bibtex also do not support @string because they also
> > rely upon the built-in Emacs parser
Dear All,
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022 at 09:17, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> AFAIU, oc-natbib/oc-bibtex also do not support @string because they also
> rely upon the built-in Emacs parser for bib files.
> I have submitted a bug report to Emacs devs [1]. Hopefully it can be
> fixed on Emacs side without a
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> Is someone using natbib/bibtex (say) expected to never ever use
> 'basic'? (I don't know.) If so, perhaps there is indeed no need to
> implement the feature. Otherwise, it seems to me that not
> implementing it amounts to having to give up on @string
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 2:10 AM wrote:
> I take the opportunity to say that I think that the simple
> self-contained example
>
>#+bibliography: references.bib
>[cite:@key]
>#+print_bibliography:
>
> should be part of the manual, especially since the
> 2021-07-31-citations post does
Bruce D'Arcus writes on Fri 8 Jul 2022 08:05:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 7:25 AM wrote:
>
> > As I do not know which of these alternatives
> >
> >- it is normal, this feature should not be there,
> >- it is an oversight,
> >- this feature is not implemented yet,
>
> I
