Soory for the re-post... Just setting up a new email client
On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:14:59 +0100 (CET) Edgar wrote:
> Dear Ihor,
> On Feb 4, 2023 at 12:31 PM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:Edgar
> Lux writes:
>> For example, ... the proposed idea is
>> a bit awkward:
>>
>> ...
>> #+cite_export:
Dear Ihor,
On Feb 4, 2023 at 12:31 PM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:Edgar
Lux writes:
> For example, ... the proposed idea is
> a bit awkward:
>
> ...
> #+cite_export: processor[opt1=val1,opt2=val2,...] bibliography-style[...]
> citation-style[...]
>
> I assumed that there is one "major"
Edgar Lux writes:
> ... All in all, the idea sounds great. I appreciate that my opinion is taken
> into account, but I know very little about citation systems. I was only a bit
> concerned about the effort which is needed to implement the changes, as
> little as they may be.
At this point,
On Jan 24, 2023 at 11:54 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:Edgar
Lux writes:
> I understand. My takeaway from here is that there is a need to provide
> extended global defaults for both bibliography style and citation style.
>
> Which is a questionable design choice. I was referring to higher-level
>
Edgar Lux writes:
> I thought that it would be preferable to have a native Org syntax.
>
>> I do not like passing the options as-is in #+cite_export because not all
>> the possible biblatex \usepackage options are affecting the
>> bibliography. Options like sortcites, maxcitenames, autocite, etc
