Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> I would love to write new tests but as I just started a new job
>> and got a new baby at the same time, I don't think I'll find the
>> time for it the next 3-4 month :(
>
> Understood. We are not in rush.
It has been a while since the last activity in this thread.
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> Unfortunately you're right and I would even say we can completely
>> remove `test-ob-clojure.el`.
>> There seems to be only tests for session support which currently
>> doesn't exist anymore and another one which tests plain tangle
>> and is not really Clojure
Daniel Kraus writes:
> Unfortunately you're right and I would even say we can completely
> remove `test-ob-clojure.el`.
> There seems to be only tests for session support which currently
> doesn't exist anymore and another one which tests plain tangle
> and is not really Clojure specific.
Done.
Hi!
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I am now going through all the babel tests that are disabled by default.
>
> ob-clojure tests appear to be completely broken:
>
> 1. (org-test-for-executable "cider") assertion is strange as cider
>package does not have any executable.
>
> 2. All the tests seems
Hi,
I am now going through all the babel tests that are disabled by default.
ob-clojure tests appear to be completely broken:
1. (org-test-for-executable "cider") assertion is strange as cider
package does not have any executable.
2. All the tests seems to assert that ob-clojure supports
