Re: [POLL] [BUG] Inverse behavior from \ [9.6.4 (release_9.6.4-1-g76cf21 @ /Users/johnw/.emacs.d/lisp/org-mode/lisp/)]

2023-08-16 Thread John Wiegley
> Ihor Radchenko writes: > No further votes. > I am thus leaving the current behavior. > Closed, poll. > Canceled, bug. Understood, thank you very much for the consideration. I’m training my fingers to the current behavoir. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B

Re: [POLL] [BUG] Inverse behavior from \ [9.6.4 (release_9.6.4-1-g76cf21 @ /Users/johnw/.emacs.d/lisp/org-mode/lisp/)]

2023-08-16 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Upon seeing the manual, I am inclined to keep the current behaviour, > unless we have other voices supporting the change. No further votes. I am thus leaving the current behavior. Closed, poll. Canceled, bug. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn

Re: [POLL] [BUG] Inverse behavior from \ [9.6.4 (release_9.6.4-1-g76cf21 @ /Users/johnw/.emacs.d/lisp/org-mode/lisp/)]

2023-06-15 Thread Ihor Radchenko
John Wiegley writes: > Since the documentation also mentions that space means “any tag”, I guess now > it’s a design question: Should mean “no tags” or “any tag”? I feel > like it should mean “no tag” only because you also use space to clear all tags > in the agenda after pressing “:”. > > If

Re: [POLL] [BUG] Inverse behavior from \ [9.6.4 (release_9.6.4-1-g76cf21 @ /Users/johnw/.emacs.d/lisp/org-mode/lisp/)]

2023-06-14 Thread John Wiegley
> "IR" == Ihor Radchenko writes: IR> It would be nice to bisect down to the commit that changed the behaviour. IR> As it usually goes with agenda, consequences of some changes are not IR> always straightforward. I have found the cause of the change in behavior:

Re: [POLL] [BUG] Inverse behavior from \ [9.6.4 (release_9.6.4-1-g76cf21 @ /Users/johnw/.emacs.d/lisp/org-mode/lisp/)]

2023-06-13 Thread John Wiegley
> "IR" == Ihor Radchenko writes: IR> Are you sure? IR> I can see 124017b6d that changes IR> (setq org-agenda-tag-filter IR> (cons (concat (if exclude "-" "+") tag) IR> current)) IR> to IR> (setq org-agenda-tag-filter IR> (cons (concat (if exclude "-" "+")

Re: [POLL] [BUG] Inverse behavior from \ [9.6.4 (release_9.6.4-1-g76cf21 @ /Users/johnw/.emacs.d/lisp/org-mode/lisp/)]

2023-06-13 Thread Ihor Radchenko
John Wiegley writes: >> Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> Changing the current behaviour will be a breaking change. >> >> I am inclined to change the current behaviour and document it, unless there >> are objections. > > I would also note that in Org-mode 8 and earlier, ‘/ ’ would limit to > all

Re: [POLL] [BUG] Inverse behavior from \ [9.6.4 (release_9.6.4-1-g76cf21 @ /Users/johnw/.emacs.d/lisp/org-mode/lisp/)]

2023-06-12 Thread John Wiegley
> Ihor Radchenko writes: > Changing the current behaviour will be a breaking change. > > I am inclined to change the current behaviour and document it, unless there > are objections. I would also note that in Org-mode 8 and earlier, ‘/ ’ would limit to all untagged entries, which is why I

[POLL] [BUG] Inverse behavior from \ [9.6.4 (release_9.6.4-1-g76cf21 @ /Users/johnw/.emacs.d/lisp/org-mode/lisp/)]

2023-06-12 Thread Ihor Radchenko
"John Wiegley" writes: > When I type ‘\ c’, the agenda view limits to my (c)all tags. This is what I > expected to see. > > When I type ‘\ ’, however, it limits to every tag *but* the empty tag. > This is the opposite of what I expect to see. Confirmed. In `org-agenda-filter-by-tag', ((or (eq

[BUG] Inverse behavior from \ [9.6.4 (release_9.6.4-1-g76cf21 @ /Users/johnw/.emacs.d/lisp/org-mode/lisp/)]

2023-06-11 Thread John Wiegley
When I type ‘\ c’, the agenda view limits to my (c)all tags. This is what I expected to see. When I type ‘\ ’, however, it limits to every tag *but* the empty tag. This is the opposite of what I expect to see. Emacs : GNU Emacs 28.2 (build 1, x86_64-apple-darwin22.5.0, Carbon Version 169