Bastien Guerry writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> So, we should probably remove zero-width shenanigans from the code.
>
> +1.
Upon further look, it appears to me that [^\000] was simply used to
match "anything, including newline" in most places.
Fixed, on main.
Hi Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> So, we should probably remove zero-width shenanigans from the code.
+1.
> Unless I miss something.
>
> Bastien, maybe you recall something about presence of null character in
> regexs?
No, I don't.
> P.S. If we decide to remove the null character, I'd
Tommy Kelly writes:
> The attached .org file describes a simple test to demonstrate the problem.
> I've also attached a .zip version, in case the NULL character in the test
> doesn't survive the gmailing process. (The null is In BLOCK 2, two
> characters after the '3' in ';; line3' If it's
