Matt writes:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:59:06 +0100 Ihor Radchenko wrote ---
>
> > Over a week have passed. No objections have been raised.
> > Feel free to apply the patches.
>
> Done. See:
>
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:59:06 +0100 Ihor Radchenko wrote ---
> Over a week have passed. No objections have been raised.
> Feel free to apply the patches.
Done. See:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=e9c288dfaccc2960e5b6889e6aabea700ad4e05a
and
Matt writes:
> 1. Can people please test that the changes to
> =org-babel-comint-with-output= haven't broken other languages?
Over a week have passed. No objections have been raised.
Feel free to apply the patches.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode
On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:16:37 +0100 Ihor Radchenko wrote ---
> Yup. Tests are passing on my side as well, and I had no comments.
> So, we are waiting for other interested users to test.
> For at least a week, so that people who check the mailing list on
> weekend have a chance to
Matt writes:
> I saw no comments on the patch part of my previous message and fear it may
> have been missed due to my inclusion of the lengthy and separate topic, "bug?
> org-babel-comint-with-output return value type".
>
> The patches fix the prompt appearing in async shell results and are
Friendly bump.
I saw no comments on the patch part of my previous message and fear it may have
been missed due to my inclusion of the lengthy and separate topic, "bug?
org-babel-comint-with-output return value type".
The patches fix the prompt appearing in async shell results and are ready to
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 12:07:55 +0100 Ihor Radchenko wrote ---
> Matt m...@excalamus.com> writes:
>
> > - Split prompt filtering and input echoing into two filters
> > + this seems to imply a =-hook= or =-functions= type implementation
>
> Not necessarily. You may just split the
Matt writes:
> - Split prompt filtering and input echoing into two filters
> + this seems to imply a =-hook= or =-functions= type implementation
Not necessarily. You may just split the filter into (1) prompt
remover; (2) body remover. The filter does not need to interact with
comint buffer
On Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:00:18 +0100 Ihor Radchenko wrote ---
> Yes. The right fix would be extracting the filter from
> `org-babel-comint-with-output' and re-using it.
This message documents my progress so that I may switch focus to Bruno's
patches in "Asynchronous blocks for
Matt writes:
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> (org-babel-do-load-languages 'org-babel-load-languages '((shell . t)))
> #+end_src
>
> #+begin_src sh :results output :session *test* :async t
> cd /tmp
> echo "hello world"
> #+end_src
>
> #+RESULTS:
> : org_babel_sh_prompt> hello world
Confirmed.
> **
* [BUG] Prompt appears in async shell results
** Minimal reproducible example
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(org-babel-do-load-languages 'org-babel-load-languages '((shell . t)))
#+end_src
#+begin_src sh :results output :session *test* :async t
cd /tmp
echo "hello world"
#+end_src
11 matches
Mail list logo
