Yes, that seems to work. It returns:
"The operation couldn’t be completed. Unable to locate a Java Runtime.
Please visit http://www.java.com for information on installing Java.
no"
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 5:11 AM Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Benjamin McMillan writes:
>
> > A call of "java --version"
Benjamin McMillan writes:
> A call of "java --version" returns
> "The operation couldn’t be completed. Unable to locate a Java Runtime.
> Please visit http://www.java.com for information on installing Java."
> This is on a mac, it seems that they provide a stub of java, but not the
> full environ
A call of "java --version" returns
"The operation couldn’t be completed. Unable to locate a Java Runtime.
Please visit http://www.java.com for information on installing Java."
This is on a mac, it seems that they provide a stub of java, but not the
full environment.
Is it possible that the test sui
Benjamin McMillan writes:
> Thank you!
> And you are right, I haven't installed java on this computer, and a
> terminal call to java returns the message "The operation couldn’t be
> completed. Unable to locate a Java Runtime."
> Is that expected behavior? I'm not very familiar with testing framew
Thank you!
And you are right, I haven't installed java on this computer, and a
terminal call to java returns the message "The operation couldn’t be
completed. Unable to locate a Java Runtime."
Is that expected behavior? I'm not very familiar with testing frameworks,
but wouldn't expect that the env
[ Adding Org mailing list back to CC to keep the conversation public ]
Benjamin McMillan writes:
> Dear Ihor,
> I am happy to make the changes.
> I am not sure what exactly made the last commit message read like a new
> feature, but hopefully the following is better:
> lisp/org.el: Add "export"
Benjamin McMillan writes:
> I attach the patch here.
Thanks!
> However, I have two questions.
> First, I am not certain that I set up the repository correctly, because
> when I run "make test" it generates 55 unexpected failures. This without
> making any changes.
> (The patch submitted here do
I attach the patch here.
However, I have two questions.
First, I am not certain that I set up the repository correctly, because
when I run "make test" it generates 55 unexpected failures. This without
making any changes.
(The patch submitted here does not generate any new failures.)
Second, the e
Ok, I am happy to submit a patch. It would be my first, so I will have to
find time to make the commit properly.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 1:59 AM Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Benjamin McMillan writes:
>
> > At some point in the last few months, org mode stopped fontifying my
> > latex export blocks.
Benjamin McMillan writes:
> At some point in the last few months, org mode stopped fontifying my
> latex export blocks. However, an older version of emacs on my computer
> still does fontify.
> (The difference is seen even opening emacs with the -q flag)
> It seems that there was a change to the
At some point in the last few months, org mode stopped fontifying my
latex export blocks. However, an older version of emacs on my computer
still does fontify.
(The difference is seen even opening emacs with the -q flag)
It seems that there was a change to the function
org-fontify-meta-lines-and-bl
11 matches
Mail list logo
