Exporting multiple #+AUTHOR keywords (was: [DISCUSSION] Allowing footnote-references inside parsed keywords (#+AUTHOR, #+TITLE, etc))

2024-02-02 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Juan Manuel Macías writes: > Sorry if this is off topic, but something like this: > > #+AUTHOR: Fred Astaire > #+AUTHOR: Ginger Rogers > > is exported to LaTeX as: > > \author{Fred Astaire Ginger Rogers} > > Shouldn't there be some separation? In LaTeX the usual thing is: > > \author{Fred Astaire

Re: [DISCUSSION] Allowing footnote-references inside parsed keywords (#+AUTHOR, #+TITLE, etc)

2024-02-02 Thread Juan Manuel Macías
Ihor Radchenko writes: > #+AUTHOR: author1 > #+FN_AUTHOR: footnote for author 1 > > #+AUTHOR: author2 > #+FN_AUTHOR: footnote for author 2 Sorry if this is off topic, but something like this: #+AUTHOR: Fred Astaire #+AUTHOR: Ginger Rogers is exported to LaTeX as: \author{Fred Astaire Ginger Ro

Re: [DISCUSSION] Allowing footnote-references inside parsed keywords (#+AUTHOR, #+TITLE, etc)

2024-02-02 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Marvin Gülker writes: > Am Freitag, dem 02. Februar 2024 schrieb Ihor Radchenko: >> What if you have multiple authors? > > At least in my discipline, we only have one footnote even in such a > case, which then is a little longer and describes each author > individually in a separate sentence. So,

Re: [DISCUSSION] Allowing footnote-references inside parsed keywords (#+AUTHOR, #+TITLE, etc)

2024-02-02 Thread Marvin Gülker
Am Freitag, dem 02. Februar 2024 schrieb Ihor Radchenko: > What if you have multiple authors? At least in my discipline, we only have one footnote even in such a case, which then is a little longer and describes each author individually in a separate sentence. So, one AUTHOR_FN keyword would be

Re: [DISCUSSION] Allowing footnote-references inside parsed keywords (#+AUTHOR, #+TITLE, etc)

2024-02-02 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Juan Manuel Macías writes: >> #+AUTHOR: John Doe[fn::935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. >> 20535-0001] >> it is probably not exported as expected anyway. > > How about using dedicated keywords? Something like: > > #+FN_AUTHOR: footnote text > #+FN_TITLE: footnote text What if you have

Re: [DISCUSSION] Allowing footnote-references inside parsed keywords (#+AUTHOR, #+TITLE, etc)

2024-02-01 Thread Marvin Gülker
Am Donnerstag, dem 01. Februar 2024 schrieb Juan Manuel Macías: > How about using dedicated keywords? Something like: > > #+FN_AUTHOR: footnote text > #+FN_TITLE: footnote text For reference -- I do not know if this prompted the discussion here -- just a few days ago I asked about footnotes in a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Allowing footnote-references inside parsed keywords (#+AUTHOR, #+TITLE, etc)

2024-02-01 Thread Juan Manuel Macías
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Max Nikulin writes: > >> On 26/01/2024 19:53, Ihor Radchenko wrote: >>> So, I am leaning towards reverting that commit - that will allow things >>> like >>> >>> #+TITLE: This is a test title[fn::This is test] >> >> I hope, document metadata will be generated with strippe

[DISCUSSION] Allowing footnote-references inside parsed keywords (#+AUTHOR, #+TITLE, etc) (was: [BUG] Footnotes in section titles)

2024-02-01 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: > On 26/01/2024 19:53, Ihor Radchenko wrote: >> So, I am leaning towards reverting that commit - that will allow things >> like >> >> #+TITLE: This is a test title[fn::This is test] > > I hope, document metadata will be generated with stripped footnotes. This is a good point