Re: [DISCUSSION] Should we deprecate python-mode.el (alternative to built-in python.el) support in ob-python? (was: [BUG] ob-python: async session evaluation does not support python-mode.el [9.6-pre (

2022-11-25 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Should we deprecate the support altogether and not bother with the extra > maintenance? Or maybe someone want to volunteer maintaining > python-mode.el integration? No objections have been received. Also, python-mode support have been broken for a long time now and no bu

Re: [DISCUSSION] Should we deprecate python-mode.el (alternative to built-in python.el) support in ob-python? (was: [BUG] ob-python: async session evaluation does not support python-mode.el [9.6-pre (

2022-11-03 Thread Jack Kamm
Ihor Radchenko writes: > However, supporting python-mode.el integration is difficult for Org > team: neither the current ob-python maintainer nor the rest of Org team > are familiar with python-mode.el. > > The bug discussed above already shows that parts of ob-python do not > work properly with

[DISCUSSION] Should we deprecate python-mode.el (alternative to built-in python.el) support in ob-python? (was: [BUG] ob-python: async session evaluation does not support python-mode.el [9.6-pre (rele

2022-11-03 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Jack Kamm writes: > I was actually planning to deprecate ob-python support for > python-mode.el, because I don't think it's worth the extra complexity & > burden to support 2 python modes. For users who prefer python-mode, I > think it would be better to have a separate ob-python-mode, perhaps in