in that case, could you pass the LaTeX through into the HTML as
an HTML comment?
It "future proofs" things, and also creates HTML files that have
better information than black and white dots ---
> "Carsten" == Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carsten> On Jun 25, 2006, at 13:3
On Jun 25, 2006, at 13:30, Carsten Dominik wrote:
However, the tex4ht output is definitely much better than
plain text representations, and yes, you can have them
read to you by a program.
I will make this configurable and allow something like
tex4ht. Thanks for pointing me to it.
I have low
> for html export from latex, I recommend tex4ht -- exporting
> images is a bad thing since someone who cannot see wont be able
> to read something that should be perfectly readable.
To be honest, I did not know about tex4ht and similar programs
before your mail, so that is the main reason why the
for html export from latex, I recommend tex4ht -- exporting
images is a bad thing since someone who cannot see wont be able
to read something that should be perfectly readable.
--
Best Regards,
--raman
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
AIM:emacspeak
This is another big release with two exciting (I think...) new features.
This is also the last big release before the summer, I expect to have
one more bugfix release early in July.
On seeing this new release appear (and after undertaking a little exercise I'll
describe in a moment) I feel impe
Hi,
I am releasing org-mode 4.39, through Emacs CVS and also on
http://www.astro.uva.nl/~dominik/Tools/org/
This is another big release with two exciting (I think...) new features.
This is also the last big release before the summer, I expect to have
one more bugfix release early in July.
Vers
