Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Currently I'm using planner as my daily tasks organizer. I'd like to >> try org.el, but I can't figure out what is it good for? So here is the >> question: can org.el replace planner? Could you give a scenario where >> org fits? > > I've been using planner (and emacs-wiki then muse) for nearly two > years. I'm now using org.el and the switch was quite easy. > > I think one of the advantages of org.el over planner is that each task > is a *heading* so that you can store additionnal information under the > task. With planner, this additionnal informations are stored within > the project file -- reaching them is not as straightforward as it is > with org.el. > > More generally, org.el appears to be more flexible, so you can adapt > it to whatever kind of project do you have. > > Best,
Thanks, Bastien. I think I'll start using org.el to find out more. -- Leon _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
