Samuel Wales writes:
> so here i go again with new decription: i am taking an entry and putting a
> whole other entry into the middle of it at the same level like this:
>
> ===
> * a new idea i had
> regarding snicker snacks
> * jabberwoky
> some sophomoric comments on a poem
>
> more sophomoric
to be clear, i am not suggesting violating outline mode's inability to
continue text after children, or violating levels. let me redo.
i am ONLY saying i sometimes have the need to yank into the middle of the
text of an entry, even if what i am yanking is an entry.
it was probalby confusing
not sure i am fully following but it seems useful.
i thought i would report on a use case thtat might or might not be
relevant. it seems so.
i often have
===
* heading 1
text of heading 1
* heading 2
text of heading 2
|
and more text
===
where | just shows where i want to yank.
and i want to
Philipp Kiefer writes:
> To be honest, I don't see much need for fine-grained special cases. I'd
> be very happy with C-u yanking at the level of the heading at point and
> C-u C-u yanking at one level below that, regardless of the exact
> position of point. I realize that would mean C-u
On 20.01.2023 11:21, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Philipp Kiefer writes:
Further, you suggest I use C-S- to demote the subtree after
pasting it at the same level as the subtree at point. But what if I used
a numerical prefix argument to copy or cut several subtrees, maybe 5 or
10? Not very
Philipp Kiefer writes:
> Further, you suggest I use C-S- to demote the subtree after
> pasting it at the same level as the subtree at point. But what if I used
> a numerical prefix argument to copy or cut several subtrees, maybe 5 or
> 10? Not very convenient at all to demote them all by
