On Friday, 19 Sep 2014 at 09:14, Andreas Kiermeier wrote:
Having used this type of setup only over the last couple of days, I've
come up with another question. It appears that the setup_fu is
executed twice ... once as it's own source block (though by itself not
maybe say :results none instead
Andreas Kiermeier andreas.kiermeier at gmail.com writes:
My two blocks (with some code removed for simplicity) are as follow:
#+NAME: tbl-refyear
#+BEGIN_SRC R :results silent :exports none
latex(tabular( code remove ))
#+END_SRC
#+BEGIN_SRC latex :noweb yes
\begin{table}[h]
Andreas Kiermeier andreas.kierme...@gmail.com writes:
I don't think you need the :noweb yes as part of the setup_fu
header, as this block is not pulling in other materials.
Having used this type of setup only over the last couple of days, I've
come up with another question. It appears that
Hi Chuck
On 19 September 2014 12:29, Charles Berry ccbe...@ucsd.edu wrote:
Why not use library(xtable) and do it all in R?
If you are not sure this is the right choice, I suggest you look at the
help page for print.xtable - you have a lot of control over caption,
label, positioning, etc.
I
Thanks Rainer,
but unfortunately this isn't working. I'm sure I'm doing something
wrong ... somewhere.
In case this makes any difference I have in the document header:
#+PROPERTY: header-args:R :session *R*
#+PROPERTY: header-args :results output graphics :exports results
I've now changed the
Hello,
I was wondering whether there exists some way of sharing literal code
(or, possibly, code results) between subsequent code blocks. E.g., I was
trying to create a document containing several tikz graphics, and I would
like to share a number of style definitions between these. When I only
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:17:14 +, Tobias Getzner wrote:
Are there any convenient inline-expansion methods I might have
overlooked?
To illustrate, I was wondering if any of the following is feasible
somehow:
* Semantic expansion
#+name setup_fu
#+begin_src sh :results raw
echo 2
On Thursday, 18 Sep 2014 at 13:26, Tobias Getzner wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:17:14 +, Tobias Getzner wrote:
Are there any convenient inline-expansion methods I might have
overlooked?
To illustrate, I was wondering if any of the following is feasible
somehow:
Yes, and you almost got
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:01:37 +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote:
Are there any convenient inline-expansion methods I might have
overlooked?
Org src blocks can reference other src blocks. Note the :noweb yes
option and the use of
Nice! And I see I get «semantic» expansion when I add call syntax
I don't think you need the :noweb yes as part of the setup_fu
header, as this block is not pulling in other materials.
Having used this type of setup only over the last couple of days, I've
come up with another question. It appears that the setup_fu is
executed twice ... once as it's own source
10 matches
Mail list logo
