>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
> Georgiy Tugai writes:
>> If I may ask, was there any particular reason for ditching XEmacs
>> compatibility?
> I didn't ditch XEmacs compatibility. Org hadn't compiled on XEmacs for
> a long time already. Org was broken on X
Hello,
Georgiy Tugai writes:
> If I may ask, was there any particular reason for ditching XEmacs
> compatibility?
I didn't ditch XEmacs compatibility. Org hadn't compiled on XEmacs for
a long time already. Org was broken on XEmacs, and no one volunteered to
solve it. Barely anyone even reported
If I may ask, was there any particular reason for ditching XEmacs
compatibility?
I have no intentions of starting an "edition war" and pre-emptively ask
for forgiveness should this inadvertently occur.
On 26 May, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I finally did the grunt job and removed all XEm
Hello,
I finally did the grunt job and removed all XEmacs compatibility in the
code base (development branch).
On the Emacs side, the following functions are now considered obsolete
and may trigger innocuous compilation warnings:
- `org-add-hook',
- `org-decompose-region',
- `org-detach-overlay'