On 7.5.2011, at 17:20, Bert Burgemeister wrote:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
Bert Burgemeister tre...@googlemail.com writes:
Just curious, is there anything I should have known that prevented the
patch submitted in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/39313,
Is it
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
Bert Burgemeister tre...@googlemail.com writes:
Just curious, is there anything I should have known that prevented the
patch submitted in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/39313,
Is it still in the bugtracker, or was it rejected?
Yes, and
Carsten Dominik cdomi...@newartisans.com writes:
Patch 781 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/781/) is now Accepted.
Maintainer comment: none
This relates to the following submission:
http://mid.gmane.org/%3C87aaf3tv5l.fsf%40fastmail.fm%3E
Here is the original message containing the
Bert Burgemeister tre...@googlemail.com writes:
Just curious, is there anything I should have known that prevented the
patch submitted in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/39313,
Is it still in the bugtracker, or was it rejected? (I attempted to check
myself, but the patchwork site
Patch 781 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/781/) is now Accepted.
Maintainer comment: none
This relates to the following submission:
http://mid.gmane.org/%3C87aaf3tv5l.fsf%40fastmail.fm%3E
Here is the original message containing the patch:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
