Re: [O] [BUG] Noweb reference eval syntax does not work

2016-08-04 Thread Charles C. Berry
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Karsten Schmidt wrote: Hi all, sorry for coming in super late to this thread, but I'd like to make a plea to *not* deprecate the :noweb-ref header arg. On 12 May 2016 at 19:35:15, Aaron Ecay wrote: To put it another way: it seems to me that the functionality of

Re: [O] [BUG] Noweb reference eval syntax does not work

2016-08-04 Thread Karsten Schmidt
Hi all, sorry for coming in super late to this thread, but I'd like to make a plea to *not* deprecate the :noweb-ref header arg. On 12 May 2016 at 19:35:15, Aaron Ecay wrote: > To put it another way: it seems to me that the functionality of > :noweb-ref can be reimplemented in terms of other

Re: [O] [BUG] Noweb reference eval syntax does not work

2016-05-15 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Aaron Ecay writes: > I think that we can provide a replacement to noweb-ref as follows: > > * Code blocks > :PROPERTIES: > :header-args: :noweb-ref foo > :END: > > #+begin_src python > block 1 > #+end_src > #+begin_src python > block 2 > #+end_src > > * Concat > >

Re: [O] [BUG] Noweb reference eval syntax does not work

2016-05-12 Thread Aaron Ecay
Hi Rasmus, hi all, 2016ko maiatzak 8an, Rasmus-ek idatzi zuen: [...] > As you mention, we’d loose the ability to chain together multiple blocks. > I reckon they are meaningfully the same language, so I don’t see a loss. > The example shown in the manual also does not convince me of the >

Re: [O] [BUG] Noweb reference eval syntax does not work

2016-05-11 Thread Charles C. Berry
On Wed, 11 May 2016, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Hello, "Thomas S. Dye" writes: The motivation for noweb-ref is discussed in this thread from about 5 years ago: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/42636/focus=42639 FWIW, I haven't used noweb-ref. Thank you for the

Re: [O] [BUG] Noweb reference eval syntax does not work

2016-05-11 Thread Samuel Wales
i use noweb-ref to concatenate different blocks. i use quick and dirty for speed. On 5/11/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > "Thomas S. Dye" writes: > >> The motivation for noweb-ref is discussed in this thread from about 5 >> years ago: >>

Re: [O] [BUG] Noweb reference eval syntax does not work

2016-05-11 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, "Thomas S. Dye" writes: > The motivation for noweb-ref is discussed in this thread from about 5 > years ago: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/42636/focus=42639 > > FWIW, I haven't used noweb-ref. Thank you for the pointers. It seems that :noweb-ref is here

Re: [O] [BUG] Noweb reference eval syntax does not work

2016-05-08 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha all, Rasmus writes: > >> What do you, and others, think? Is NAME enough for noweb syntax, or is >> there a real need fo :noweb-ref? > > I've put Aaron in carbon copy as he’s quite familiar with ob. The motivation for noweb-ref is discussed in this thread from about 5 years ago:

Re: [O] [BUG] Noweb reference eval syntax does not work

2016-05-08 Thread Rasmus
Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > fm4d writes: > >> The noweb reference syntax that should insert results of >> evaluation of src block itself instead of src block as >> described in `org-babel-expand-noweb-reference` does not >> seems to work. >> >> >> Code

Re: [O] [BUG] Noweb reference eval syntax does not work

2016-05-08 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, fm4d writes: > The noweb reference syntax that should insert results of > evaluation of src block itself instead of src block as > described in `org-babel-expand-noweb-reference` does not > seems to work. > > > Code for replication: > > * Assign > > First we assign abc: >

[O] [BUG] Noweb reference eval syntax does not work

2016-05-05 Thread fm4d
The noweb reference syntax that should insert results of evaluation of src block itself instead of src block as described in `org-babel-expand-noweb-reference` does not seems to work. Code for replication: * Assign First we assign abc: #+begin_src python :noweb-ref assign_abc abc = "abc" +