Hi,
Rainer M Krug writes:
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> Rainer M Krug writes:
>>
>>> I tried in LibreOffice, and indeed it does not seem to be possible. I
>>> don't know what the convention is, but I don't like that an invald .odt
>>> file is produced. Maybe give a warning about "incompatible features
Rasmus writes:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>
>> I tried in LibreOffice, and indeed it does not seem to be possible. I
>> don't know what the convention is, but I don't like that an invald .odt
>> file is produced. Maybe give a warning about "incompatible features" or
>> just drop the footnote in the
Rainer M Krug writes:
> I tried in LibreOffice, and indeed it does not seem to be possible. I
> don't know what the convention is, but I don't like that an invald .odt
> file is produced. Maybe give a warning about "incompatible features" or
> just drop the footnote in the footnote?
Dropping it
Rasmus writes:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>
>> The odt is attached for reference.
>
> Please also provide an odt document with the expected, working result.
> (I could not produce such a document in LO within 20s, but perhaps it’s
> possible).
I am not a LibreOffice / MS Word person (but my co-aut
Rainer M Krug writes:
> The odt is attached for reference.
Please also provide an odt document with the expected, working result.
(I could not produce such a document in LO within 20s, but perhaps it’s
possible).
Thanks,
Rasmus
--
You people at the NSA are becoming my new best friends!
The following .org file produces an invalid .odt file upon export to odt
because of the footnote in the footnote:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
#+TITLE: Footnote in footnote produces invalid .odt
#+AUTHOR: Rainer M. Krug
* A Footnote in a Footnote
Some footnot
