Hi Mark,
"Mark E. Shoulson" writes:
> On 05/25/2012 11:04 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Hello,
>> You're right, there could be another entity for ^. asciicirc is good
>> enough as a name. Would you want to make a patch for it?
>>
>> Also, you may want to consider signing FSF papers for more imp
On 05/25/2012 11:04 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
You're right, there could be another entity for ^. asciicirc is good
enough as a name. Would you want to make a patch for it?
Also, you may want to consider signing FSF papers for more important
contributions.
Yes, I'll do both those thing
Hello,
"Mark E. Shoulson" writes:
> I hadn't counted \circ because it expands under Unicode to ˆ (U+02C6)
> and not to the true ascii circumflex ^ (U+005E); the point of these
> entities is to represent ascii characters that otherwise would confuse
> things. Maybe \circ should expand to ^; mayb
On 05/23/2012 05:53 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
"Mark E. Shoulson" writes:
Also attached is another patch that might or might not be useful.
Sometimes it can be a problem when you can't type, say, asterisks
around a word when you NEED asterisks around the word, not a boldface
word (I'd b