Hi Andrzej,
Andrzej Lichnerowicz writes:
> I'm here, but frankly the list is a bit hard to follow regularly :)
You bet...
> As for the patch, definitely! It's a lot more clean way, and fixes
> value results. Thanks Asrail!
Thanks to both of you, I've now applied the patch!
Best,
--
Bastie
Hi Bastien,
I'm here, but frankly the list is a bit hard to follow regularly :)
As for the patch, definitely! It's a lot more clean way, and fixes value
results. Thanks Asrail!
--a.
2012/10/24 Bastien
> Hi Andrzej,
>
> Asrail posted this patch against ob-scala.el a while ago.
>
> Can you con
Hi Andrzej,
Asrail posted this patch against ob-scala.el a while ago.
Can you confirm it is okay to apply it? I'm reattaching
the patch in case you are not reading the Orgmode mailing
list anymore.
Thanks in advance!
Asrail writes:
> * lisp/ob-scala.el (org-babel-scala-wrapper-method): Use
Asrail writes:
> * lisp/ob-scala.el (org-babel-scala-wrapper-method): Use an scala
> block enclosing the submitted code
>
> The string representing an well formed block was not an Scala
> code. I put the string from the user into an block, surrounded by an
> call to replace the default output
Hi,
Could someone please review this patch?
On Oct 15, 2012 4:39 PM, "Asrail" wrote:
> * lisp/ob-scala.el (org-babel-scala-wrapper-method): Use an scala
> block enclosing the submitted code
>
> The string representing an well formed block was not an Scala
> code. I put the string from the us
* lisp/ob-scala.el (org-babel-scala-wrapper-method): Use an scala
block enclosing the submitted code
The string representing an well formed block was not an Scala
code. I put the string from the user into an block, surrounded by an
call to replace the default output stream.
0001-Babel-add-re
