On 19.7.2013, at 19:54, Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Would you wrap it all up in a patch and submit it? It would be great to
have incorporated.
ok, done.
Brilliant! Thanks.
This works now.
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
seems to be a bigger project
No, it is not. Unless you consider adding these a bigger project.
(defvar org-message-level)
(defun org-message (level other args)
)
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
[I have no specific opinions on this patch.]
The customary way is to put each message at different level. The
threshold level that the user wishes to see is configurable. Any
logging message that falls below or above that threshold gets
[I have no specific opinions on this patch.]
The customary way is to put each message at different level. The
threshold level that the user wishes to see is configurable. Any
logging message that falls below or above that threshold gets filtered.
This way you don't introduce switches on a
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Would you wrap it all up in a patch and submit it? It would be great to
have incorporated.
ok, done.
PS
I included this into `outshine.el' too, since outline-cycle showed the
same behaviour.
From 0a4dad9119af9aed8e5160a05e81ac35f2bb0044 Mon Sep 17
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Would you wrap it all up in a patch and submit it? It would be great to
have incorporated.
ok, done.
Brilliant! Thanks.
--
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.3.50.1, Org release_8.0.6-341-g338603
