Re: [O] [PATCH] Re: [babel] Relative path for "dir" header argument

2012-06-05 Thread Eric Schulte
Hans-Peter Deifel writes: > On Di, Mai 29 2012, Hans-Peter Deifel wrote: >> Currently, the 'dir'-argument only understands absolute paths, because >> it simply sets default-directory. >> >> I think it would be quite useful to be able to specify paths relative to >> the default-directory of the bu

Re: [O] [PATCH] Re: [babel] Relative path for "dir" header argument

2012-06-05 Thread Forian Schmaus
Hans-Peter Deifel gmx.de> writes: > > On Di, Mai 29 2012, Hans-Peter Deifel wrote: > > Currently, the 'dir'-argument only understands absolute paths, because > > it simply sets default-directory. > > > > I think it would be quite useful to be able to specify paths relative to > > the default-dir

[O] [PATCH] Re: [babel] Relative path for "dir" header argument

2012-06-04 Thread Hans-Peter Deifel
On Di, Mai 29 2012, Hans-Peter Deifel wrote: > Currently, the 'dir'-argument only understands absolute paths, because > it simply sets default-directory. > > I think it would be quite useful to be able to specify paths relative to > the default-directory of the buffer. What do you think? I tried t