Matt Lundin writes:
> Yes, that's a great idea. I've added it to the patch.
Thank you. LGTM.
> One caveat: this patch does not implement recursive checking of included
> files (i.e., included files that include other files), but this could be
> added in the future.
Well, if you're not out of s
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Matt Lundin writes:
>
>> OK, I've worked up a patch that solves several of these issues. The
>> basic idea is to check when publishing an org file whether it includes
>> other org files and then to store that data in the cache. That way,
>> org-publish-cache-
Hello,
Matt Lundin writes:
> OK, I've worked up a patch that solves several of these issues. The
> basic idea is to check when publishing an org file whether it includes
> other org files and then to store that data in the cache. That way,
> org-publish-cache-file-needs-publishing does not need
Matt Lundin writes:
> I've been doing some testing of org-publish functions and have found a
> few problems with org-publish-cache-file-needs-publishing. They arise
> from the fact that it attempts to take included files into account.
OK, I've worked up a patch that solves several of these issue
