Thomas S. Dye t...@tsdye.com writes:
Aloha Nicolas,
The attached patch is based on current maint branch.
Applied. Thank you.
Regards,
Aloha Nicolas,
The attached patch is based on current maint branch.
Let me know if you have questions.
All the best,
Tom
From e5ab2427af7095db8c7f080dc8f9457021a10544 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: tsdye t...@tsdye.com
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:34:50 -1000
Subject: [PATCH] Edit date and time
@Fabrice Thanks for sharing your examples!
@Suvayu I tried removing #+DATE: line.. but with that I don't see the date
stamp in html exports. The advantage of {{{time(FORMAT)}}} is that I can
also control the formatting of the date-time stamp.
--
Kaushal Modi
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:53 AM,
Hello,
Thomas S. Dye t...@tsdye.com writes:
A second patch is attached.
Thank you.
From cb30697627afacc8950ef85b839f47d48371f39b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: tsdye t...@tsdye.com
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:08:34 -1000
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] More date and time macro edits
I think the commit
Aha.. I am using a custom postamble for html:
(setq org-html-postamble t) ; default value = 'auto
(setq org-html-postamble-format
`((en
,(concat Exported using
;; %c is replaced with
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:01:42AM -0400, Kaushal wrote:
@Fabrice Thanks for sharing your examples!
@Suvayu I tried removing #+DATE: line.. but with that I don't see the date
stamp in html exports. The advantage of {{{time(FORMAT)}}} is that I can
also control the formatting of the date-time
OK, here is a patch that tries to do that.
All the best,
Tom
Kaushal kaushal.m...@gmail.com writes:
Yeah, the documentation definitely needs refining.
{{{date}}} / {{{date(FORMAT)}}} [FORMAT is optional] - Inserts the
#+DATE keyword value;
optionally formats as per FORMAT (Refer
Thanks Fabrice, very helpful.
A second patch is attached.
All the best,
Tom
Fabrice Niessen fni-n...@pirilampo.org writes:
Doesn't it get its information from a timestamp in #+DATE?
I think you missed out explaining what {{{time(FORMAT)}}} does.
You might be interested by `date', `time'
Doesn't it get its information from a timestamp in #+DATE?
I think you missed out explaining what {{{time(FORMAT)}}} does.
You might be interested by `date', `time' and `modification-time',
depending on what you want to achieve. I've put some examples in my
Org-macros project about those:
I think you missed out explaining what {{{time(FORMAT)}}} does.
--
Kaushal Modi
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Thomas S. Dye t...@tsdye.com wrote:
OK, here is a patch that tries to do that.
All the best,
Tom
Kaushal kaushal.m...@gmail.com writes:
Yeah, the documentation definitely
Doesn't it get its information from a timestamp in #+DATE?
Kaushal kaushal.m...@gmail.com writes:
I think you missed out explaining what {{{time(FORMAT)}}} does.
--
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com
11 matches
Mail list logo
