Re: [O] [PATCH] hide inline-tasks in 'children visibility state

2013-11-05 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Jonas Hörsch writes: > On Thu, Oct 31 2013, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> I suggest to use `case' here, but it's really a matter of style. > > fine with me. i wasn't sure about the usage convention for cl. i > switched to the namespaced cl-case variant, for now. It's better to use `case' a

Re: [O] [PATCH] hide inline-tasks in 'children visibility state

2013-11-04 Thread Jonas Hörsch
Hi, On Thu, Oct 31 2013, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > co...@online.de (Jonas Hörsch) writes: >> >> + (cond ((eq state 'contents) > > I suggest to use `case' here, but it's really a matter of style. fine with me. i wasn't sure about the usage convention for cl. i switched to the namespaced cl-case

Re: [O] [PATCH] hide inline-tasks in 'children visibility state

2013-10-31 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, co...@online.de (Jonas Hörsch) writes: > one more patch, which takes care of re-hiding inline-tasks > properly. finally it is possible to work with longer inline tasks > without them getting always in the way. Thank you for the patch. Here are a few comments. > Subject: [PATCH] org-inlin

[O] [PATCH] hide inline-tasks in 'children visibility state

2013-10-30 Thread Jonas Hörsch
hej, one more patch, which takes care of re-hiding inline-tasks properly. finally it is possible to work with longer inline tasks without them getting always in the way. just bump me, if anything is not to your liking cheers, jonas From 447d528263728ea56f390ae8dfdfa99880d6ccb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00: