Based on discussion with Nicolas Goaziou and Eric Schulte, this patch
has been refactored and reimplemented as a patch series. Eric Schulte
has contributed additional improvements. The functionality is now in
Org.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Bl
Achim Gratz writes:
> Bastien altern.org> writes:
>
>> thanks for the patch. I applied it but renamed cache? and
>> cache-current? to cache-p and cache-current-p.
>
> That patch needs amending. You let-bind cache-current, but then try to use
> cache-current-p.
Er... fixed, thanks for double-c
Bastien altern.org> writes:
> thanks for the patch. I applied it but renamed cache? and
> cache-current? to cache-p and cache-current-p.
That patch needs amending. You let-bind cache-current, but then try to use
cache-current-p.
Regards,
Achim.
Achim Gratz writes:
> There's another "cache?" in ob-lob, IIRC.
Fixed, thanks.
--
Bastien
Bastien altern.org> writes:
> thanks for the patch. I applied it but renamed cache? and
> cache-current? to cache-p and cache-current-p.
Thanks. I have no preference either way regarding the names, I was just
following the example of cache?, which I copied from the original code. There's
anoth
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Babel asks for confirmation to evaluate a source block even when it is
> going to use the cached value. This patch skips the superfluous
> confirmation in that case (no evaluation takes place, the cached value
> is used).
thanks for the patch. I applied it but
Babel asks for confirmation to evaluate a source block even when it is
going to use the cached value. This patch skips the superfluous
confirmation in that case (no evaluation takes place, the cached value
is used).
>From da687f5a40767921c7f3f309eeda0cadb09f7116 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ac
