Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> This is a simple suggestion to improve function `org-property-action'.
>> Currently `org-property-action' errors when 'not at a property'. But
>> this is unnecessary AFAICS.
>>
>> Without the restriction one can use the function to control any property
>> inclusive set
Hello,
Marco Wahl writes:
> This is a simple suggestion to improve function `org-property-action'.
> Currently `org-property-action' errors when 'not at a property'. But
> this is unnecessary AFAICS.
>
> Without the restriction one can use the function to control any property
> inclusive settin
Hi!
This is a simple suggestion to improve function `org-property-action'.
Currently `org-property-action' errors when 'not at a property'. But
this is unnecessary AFAICS.
Without the restriction one can use the function to control any property
inclusive setting the very first property.
Do I mi
