Re: [O] [PATCH] org-clock: Fix clock report sometimes ignoring hours before :wstart

2017-10-06 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Georgiy Tugai writes: > Should I flatten the commits i.e. send original + new changes as one > patch? Yes, please. > Also, I have not yet signed FSF papers -- will this pose a problem for > incorporating the test suite changes? I don't think so. Thank you for the work. Regards, --

Re: [O] [PATCH] org-clock: Fix clock report sometimes ignoring hours before :wstart

2017-10-06 Thread Georgiy Tugai
While implementing the test, I found a bug in my patch. Thanks for pointing out the test suite! :) Should I flatten the commits i.e. send original + new changes as one patch? Also, I have not yet signed FSF papers -- will this pose a problem for incorporating the test suite changes? Regards, Geo

Re: [O] [PATCH] org-clock: Fix clock report sometimes ignoring hours before :wstart

2017-10-05 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Georgiy Tugai writes: > * lisp/org-clock (org-clocktable-steps): Fix weekly-step clock report > ignoring hours between start of period and start of week, when start > of period is on a day of week numerically less than start of week. > > Clock report now always inserts a "week" star

[O] [PATCH] org-clock: Fix clock report sometimes ignoring hours before :wstart

2017-10-04 Thread Georgiy Tugai
* lisp/org-clock (org-clocktable-steps): Fix weekly-step clock report ignoring hours between start of period and start of week, when start of period is on a day of week numerically less than start of week. Clock report now always inserts a "week" starting at the start of the period, if nec