Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> Sure! The actual ordering of stuff was an arbitrary choice on my part --
> the only thing I cared about was getting done and not-done separated.
> This looks like a tidier solution, to boot...
Applied, thanks!
--
Bastien
Bastien writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> For some reason I've been sorting lots of TODOs recently, and found the
>> default behavior of org-sort-entries a little odd. It sorts according to
>> the order found in org-todo-keywords-1, which apparently just comes from
>> the order
Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> For some reason I've been sorting lots of TODOs recently, and found the
> default behavior of org-sort-entries a little odd. It sorts according to
> the order found in org-todo-keywords-1, which apparently just comes from
> the order the keywords were scanned d
For some reason I've been sorting lots of TODOs recently, and found the
default behavior of org-sort-entries a little odd. It sorts according to
the order found in org-todo-keywords-1, which apparently just comes from
the order the keywords were scanned during setup. I don't think that's
all that u