Re: [O] [POLL] Do you need special entities in radio target?

Nicolas Goaziou writes: Christian Moe ... writes: But is this only about special entities, or about all Org syntax, the latter. Thanks for clarifying. including subscripts/superscripts, emphasis...? That would be limiting. As long as radio targets are visible parts of the text, I'd like

Re: [O] [POLL] Do you need special entities in radio target?

Excluding special entities would not interfere with anything I've done with radio targets so far. I can imagine future uses, but probably nothing I couldn't work around with Unicode. But is this only about special entities, or about all Org syntax, including subscripts/superscripts, emphasis...?

Re: [O] [POLL] Do you need special entities in radio target?

Hello, Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.com writes: But is this only about special entities, or about all Org syntax, the latter. including subscripts/superscripts, emphasis...? That would be limiting. As long as radio targets are visible parts of the text, I'd like them to continue

[O] [POLL] Do you need special entities in radio target?

Hi all, the subject says it all -- see this thread for reference: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/83648 Would you be okay if radio targets like radio target are limited to plain text? Thanks for your feedback, -- Bastien

Re: [O] [POLL] Do you need special entities in radio target?

imo radio targets are fundamentally limited because they only work in the same file, while org has become a multi-file mode. i am ok with cosmetic limitations in addition. -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it.