Re: [O] [bug] Remote durations are considered as fractions

2012-06-04 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi, May I bump up this thread (and its inlined, older, corollary)? Best regards, Seb "Sebastien Vauban" wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" wrote: >> Bastien wrote: >>> "Sebastien Vauban" writes: >>> I think this is it... >>> >>> Yes.. but in fact, this is precisely the difference between the `t

Re: [O] [bug] Remote durations are considered as fractions

2012-05-09 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Bastien, "Sebastien Vauban" wrote: > Bastien wrote: >> "Sebastien Vauban" writes: >> >>> I think this is it... >> >> Yes.. but in fact, this is precisely the difference between the `t' and the >> `T' flags - the latter displays seconds while the former display the output >> according to `org-ta

Re: [O] [bug] Remote durations are considered as fractions

2012-05-02 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Bastien, Bastien wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >> I think this is it... > > Yes.. but in fact, this is precisely the difference between the `t' and the > `T' flags - the latter displays seconds while the former display the output > according to `org-table-duration-custom-format', which

Re: [O] [bug] Remote durations are considered as fractions

2012-04-20 Thread Bastien
Hi Sébastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > I think this is it... Yes.. but in fact, this is precisely the difference between the `t' and the `T' flags - the latter displays seconds while the former display the output according to `org-table-duration-custom-format', which you can customize.

Re: [O] [bug] Remote durations are considered as fractions

2012-04-20 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Bastien, Bastien wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >> BTW, *could we limit the format of "T" to H:MM*, instead of H:MM:SS? The >> first >> case seems much more common, and the one used in all time clocking functions >> of Org. > > Patch welcome! I think this is it... >From a77fe281afe5b

Re: [O] [bug] Remote durations are considered as fractions

2012-04-20 Thread Bastien
Hi Sébastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > BTW, *could we limit the format of "T" to H:MM*, instead of H:MM:SS? The first > case seems much more common, and the one used in all time clocking functions > of Org. Patch welcome! -- Bastien

Re: [O] [bug] Remote durations are considered as fractions

2012-04-19 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Bastien, Bastien wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >> Using the flag T does not help: >> >> | Planning | 00:00:03 | >> | Reporting | 00:00:09 | >> #+TBLFM: @1$2=remote(hours-spent,@4$4);T > > This should work as expected now (with the "T" flag.) I confirm this is now working as expected

Re: [O] [bug] Remote durations are considered as fractions

2012-04-10 Thread Bastien
Hi Sébastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Using the flag T does not help: > > | Planning | 00:00:03 | > | Reporting | 00:00:09 | > #+TBLFM: @1$2=remote(hours-spent,@4$4);T This should work as expected now (with the "T" flag.) Note that the conversion of 3:12 into 1:4 is independant of getti

[O] [bug] Remote durations are considered as fractions

2012-04-03 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello, It took me a while to understand what was going on with some figures in tables derived from a clock report, but I found it: computed total times, referred in a table, are converted as fractions, that is... - 3:36 becomes 1:12 (because 3/36 = 1/12) - 0:51 becomes 0 - 9:03 becomes 3 - 3:34 s