Hello,
Martin Carlé writes:
> Never mind, I shall explain and release all the hack, if there is more
> time.
OK.
> Because, tags are a general and convenient way of collecting sections
> and I'like to avoid special where ever possible.
Well, `org-footnote-section' is special, but it's really
On 2016-02-28 Sun 02:23, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Martin Carlé writes:
>
>> Well, I wrapped the exporter mechanism into some advice functions that
>> allow for many different exports from a single file in such a manner that
>> multiple exports are not restricted to subtrees.
>
> Not s
Hello,
Martin Carlé writes:
> Well, I wrapped the exporter mechanism into some advice functions that
> allow for many different exports from a single file in such a manner that
> multiple exports are not restricted to subtrees.
Not sure to understand this.
> This extended export mechanism coll
Thanks for inviting me to elaborate.
Well, I wrapped the exporter mechanism into some advice functions that
allow for many different exports from a single file in such a manner that
multiple exports are not restricted to subtrees.
This extended export mechanism collects sections as marked by tags
Hello,
Martin Carlé writes:
> Keeping the tags is actually crucial to my practice, since I run some
> filters during export based on tags.
>
> Couldn't the algorithm be adopted to check for tags assigned to the
> org-footnote-section and then re-create them as well?
Footnote section is special,
Thank you for the quick answer!
All right, deletion and recreation of the section is fine with me, as
long as the tags would be recreated as well.
Keeping the tags is actually crucial to my practice, since I run some
filters during export based on tags.
Couldn't the algorithm be adopted to check
Aloha Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Thomas S. Dye writes:
>
>> Thanks for pointing this out. Is it possible to disable all the features,
>> like
>> sorting, that erase without notice? I've got org-footnote-auto-adjust
>> set to nil, which looks like a step in the right directi
Hello,
Thomas S. Dye writes:
> Thanks for pointing this out. Is it possible to disable all the features,
> like
> sorting, that erase without notice? I've got org-footnote-auto-adjust
> set to nil, which looks like a step in the right direction, but I'm
> wondering if there is more I can do.
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
> You shouldn't put anything else than footnotes in the footnotes section.
> It can be erased without notice, e.g., when sorting footnotes, and all
> information inside, besides footnotes, will be lost.
Thanks for pointing this out. Is it possible to disable all the fea
Hello,
Martin Carlé writes:
> the outline heading containing footnote definitions (as specified by
> org-footnote-section) does not accept tags.
>
> E.g. if you add a tag to this headline and then try to insert a footnote
> via the org-footnote-action command, always a new headline without the
>
Hello,
the outline heading containing footnote definitions (as specified by
org-footnote-section) does not accept tags.
E.g. if you add a tag to this headline and then try to insert a footnote
via the org-footnote-action command, always a new headline without the
tag is created and the former foo
11 matches
Mail list logo
