Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > the only feature that seems to be missing from 8 and 9maint that might > be needed in 9master is a list of strings for todo kw that should show > future repeats. thus you could say that NOTE does not show future > repeats, but NEXTREPEAT

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

On 12/3/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Anyway, I pushed a change to maint that should solve the "72x vs. 2x" > issue. thank you! i am glad i do not have to switch to master to get 2x. > I implemented the following variables in master: > > -

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > cesar mena writes: > >> just making sure i'm getting this. >> >> in maint, if org-agenda-repeating-timestamp-show-all is nil we get >> 72x. if it is non nil we get 2x. i'm in the 72x camp, so i don't need to >> do

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, cesar mena writes: > just making sure i'm getting this. > > in maint, if org-agenda-repeating-timestamp-show-all is nil we get > 72x. if it is non nil we get 2x. i'm in the 72x camp, so i don't need to > do anything. It is the opposite.

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

hello, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Samuel Wales writes: > >> thanks for the explanation. the idea is that org 9 is using the >> previously scheduled section as a complete list and that it did not >> trigger on the first day and did on the

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > thanks for the explanation. the idea is that org 9 is using the > previously scheduled section as a complete list and that it did not > trigger on the first day and did on the second, and show-all nil in > org 9 does not refer to the

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

thank you.

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > cesar mena writes: > >> hello guys, >> >> Samuel Wales writes: >> >>> by the way there is a bug in org 9 where org-scheduled face is >>> erroneously used instead of org-scheduled-previously. >>

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, cesar mena writes: > hello guys, > > Samuel Wales writes: > >> by the way there is a bug in org 9 where org-scheduled face is >> erroneously used instead of org-scheduled-previously. > > as pointed out by samuel, commit >

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

hello guys, Samuel Wales writes: > by the way there is a bug in org 9 where org-scheduled face is > erroneously used instead of org-scheduled-previously. as pointed out by samuel, commit 69ec6258b65a5d317f0dcb275ec2d5a90f72f191 introduced a bug where a previously

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

by the way, the echo area already shows some information on olpath. it could also show the number of days since the last repeat instance, and the number of days since the timestamp date.

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

On 11/28/16, cesar mena wrote: > right the rationale there is that it would be misleading to show 2x > when you really haven't "doneify" the task for more than 72 days. but, > alas, this is what org 8 does. misleading for your use case, but not misleading for mine. :] > i

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

On 11/28/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > It shows first repeat. I assume you tested that yesterday, so you got > the repeat for today. Since the repeat didn't trigger "today" (which is > actually yesterday), it also displays a reminder for the scheduled item > there. thanks

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

hello list, nicolas, samuel, On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Samuel Wales writes: > >> On 11/27/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >>> I pushed a few more fixed in plain time-stamps and

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > On 11/27/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> I pushed a few more fixed in plain time-stamps and deadlines. Please >> report if you find anything suspicious. > > please try this: > > SCHEDULED: <2016-09-17 Sat .+2d> > >

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

On 11/27/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > I pushed a few more fixed in plain time-stamps and deadlines. Please > report if you find anything suspicious. please try this: SCHEDULED: <2016-09-17 Sat .+2d> emacs -Q, with a 2-day span and show-all nil. in org 8: 1] it

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Samuel Wales writes: > when show all is nil, i expect the second of a two-day span to not > show the repeater if the first shows it. org 8 seems more correct to > me. I pushed a few more fixed in plain time-stamps and deadlines. Please report if you find anything

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

On 11/27/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > It sounds correct. With ".+1d" repeater, you expect to repeat the task > every day. when show all is nil, i expect the second of a two-day span to not show the repeater if the first shows it. org 8 seems more correct to me. -- The

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > you recently fixed a few things from your patch. dunno if it was > supposed to or not, but it seems to have cleared up a lot of bugs. > > i found a lot of differences from org 8 to your patch, but only one > from org 8 to your recent fixes: a

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

you recently fixed a few things from your patch. dunno if it was supposed to or not, but it seems to have cleared up a lot of bugs. i found a lot of differences from org 8 to your patch, but only one from org 8 to your recent fixes: a bare ts like <2016-11-23 Wed 12:00 .+1d> shows up twice in a

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > not sure what you mean by no repeat is active. It means that either the scheduled date has no repeater or the repeat doesn't happen "today" (e.g., "+2d" repeat starting yesterday). > * NOTE test event > <2015-06-03 Wed 12:00

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

On 11/25/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > suggesting, AFAIU. The only change is that for "today", when _no repeat > is active_, assuming `org-agenda-repeating-timestamp-show-all' is nil, > the agenda will still display a reminder (e.g., Sched.2x) so you get > a chance to

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > i will try it, but testing it thoroughly is problematic for me. can > you describe? What do you want me to describe? It should conform to what you were suggesting, AFAIU. The only change is that for "today", when _no repeat is active_,

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

thank you. i will try it, but testing it thoroughly is problematic for me. can you describe? also, i found that events exhibit the same bug, in case that is relevant.

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > i tried. i might have made a mistake. please go easy on me > if so. > > i believe this is a difference of use case. I pushed a fix in maint branch. It is slightly different from Org 8.0, in particular for "today" when no repeater is

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

hi nicolas, thanks for your reply. some things that i expected from org x<=8 to occur are not occurring on the dates i expected or in the time grid. so i wonder: 1) what changed in repeater agenda behavior from org 8 to org 9 - at least one and possibly several 2) where in the

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > On 11/13/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> If a nil `org-agenda-repeating-timestamp-show-all' treated time-stamps >> with a repeater as regular time-stamp in the agenda, I could see a use >> for that. > > not sure what

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

On 11/13/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > I can reproduce it, now. thanks. > If a nil `org-agenda-repeating-timestamp-show-all' treated time-stamps > with a repeater as regular time-stamp in the agenda, I could see a use > for that. not sure what you mean by this. >

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > ok, i have a new -Q minimal testcase, which is attached. it explains > how to run it at the top. > > the relevant part is at the bottom, so you could just copy that if you > prefer to try your own setup instead. it's 3 lines. > > the task is

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

ok, i have a new -Q minimal testcase, which is attached. it explains how to run it at the top. the relevant part is at the bottom, so you could just copy that if you prefer to try your own setup instead. it's 3 lines. the task is this: *** NEXT xyzzy test SCHEDULED: <2016-11-07 Mon

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Samuel Wales writes: > On 11/10/16, cesar mena wrote: >> so the only thing i noticed is that your test case did not set >> org-agenda-files for me. specifically your regexp did not pick up the >> file (filename is test.org). i changed it as below, and it

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > On 11/9/16, cm...@pobox.com wrote: >>> SCHEDULED: <2016-11-07 Mon 17:00> > >> this example does not have a repeater though. without a repeater, you >> are right, it does not show in the time grid. > > oops. > > please put

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

On 11/10/16, cesar mena wrote: > so the only thing i noticed is that your test case did not set > org-agenda-files for me. specifically your regexp did not pick up the > file (filename is test.org). i changed it as below, and it worked. thanks. i have documented my testcase for

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

On 11/9/16, cesar mena wrote: > 17:00.. Sched. 3x: TODO test you got this running the testcase? there is no xyzzy there. > did you check the value of org-agenda-repeating-timestamp-show-all as > nicolas suggested? it is emacs -Q, and it is not changed in

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

On 11/9/16, cm...@pobox.com wrote: >> SCHEDULED: <2016-11-07 Mon 17:00> > this example does not have a repeater though. without a repeater, you > are right, it does not show in the time grid. oops. please put .+1d on that now try it for me it only shows a 3x. it does not show

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

On 11/8/16, cesar mena wrote: > i just tried this on maint, and it does show up in the time grid as > well. are you running it with today only in the agenda? i.e. not weekly. i am still getting the bug in org maint, with debian jessie emacs 24.4.1. here is the mce. i

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

thanks to both you and cesar. it appears i have to investigate further. On 11/8/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Well, it does here. Not sure what is wrong in your set-up. You may to > try re-installing Org.

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

> it's a tagged (scheduled) active timestamp with a time. it belongs in > the grid. it showed up in the grid in org 8. it does not now. Well, it does here. Not sure what is wrong in your set-up. You may to try re-installing Org. Regards,

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

hi nicolas, On 11/8/16, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > What is "the timed section" of agenda? the time grid. >> it shows in scheduled section >> other tasks like it show in timed section >> if the date is today, then it works correctly >> *correctly to me is the traditional

Re: [O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > *** NEXTREPEAT test :goto: > SCHEDULED: <2016-07-15 Fri 21:00 .+1d> > > does not show up in the timed section of agenda What is "the timed section" of agenda? > it shows in scheduled section > other tasks like it show in timed

[O] [bug] timed repeater shows up in wrong place

thank you to everybody who made org 9 possible. in recent org 9 maint *** NEXTREPEAT test :goto: SCHEDULED: <2016-07-15 Fri 21:00 .+1d> does not show up in the timed section of agenda it shows in scheduled section other tasks like it show in timed section if the date is today, then it