Hi suvayu ali,
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Andreas Leha
> wrote:
>> Will this new backend support presentations in subtrees? I think, what
>> I want is not possible with the current one.
>>
>> As an example, consider files structured like this:
>>
>> #+begin_src org
>> *
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Andreas Leha
wrote:
> Will this new backend support presentations in subtrees? I think, what
> I want is not possible with the current one.
>
> As an example, consider files structured like this:
>
> #+begin_src org
> * Presentations
> ** Workshop 20
Hi Nicolas,
> As I announced in another thread, I'm starting a Beamer back-end for the
> new export engine. Though, before I start hacking, I have a question
> about environments.
Will this new backend support presentations in subtrees? I think, what
I want is not possible with the current one.
Nicolas,
> I'll keep headlines for blocks. But I think I'll introduce a couple of
> small changes.
I really like all the changes you propose. The result would appear to
be a clean design. I particularly like the defaulting of headlines to
blocks.
Unlike others, I am not bothered about *alert*
Hello,
"Sebastien Vauban"
writes:
>> - Sectioning and packages are extracted from `org-e-latex-classes'.
>> Since calling Beamer back-end is explicit, it can be applied on any
>> tex file, not only when that file starts with
>> "\documentclass{beamer}". Additionally, an equivalent to
>>
Hi Nicolas,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> If you want to try them out (there has been no serious debugging for
> them), you can
>
> (defalias 'org-metaup 'org-element-drag-backward)
>
> `org-element-drag-backward' is a strict super-set for `org-metaup'.
>
I will tr
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> The noframe tag sounds good.
> Do you have any example of the use you have in mind? I don't know
> what
> kind of contents one would like add between frames (excepted notes).
- If you are to repeat frames
- Imagine a complicated tikz picture which you don't want t
Hello,
Rasmus writes:
>> - There is no separate syntax for \alert{} command: it is the default
>> output for bold objects (i.e. *text* becomes \alert{text}).
>
> Would bold then be archived with some other markup? Or would it just
> not be possible to get bold text (without defaulting to \bol
Hi Nicolas,
First, a big thank you for your work on this as well...
Here, inline, a couple of quick remarks...
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>>> See `org-element-drag-backward' and `org-element-drag-forward'.
>>
>> Okay. Will it be easy to bind these to M- etc. to achieve
>>
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> - There is no separate syntax for \alert{} command: it is the default
> output for bold objects (i.e. *text* becomes \alert{text}).
Would bold then be archived with some other markup? Or would it just
not be possible to get bold text (without defaulting to \bold{·})?
Hello,
Eric S Fraga writes:
>> See `org-element-drag-backward' and `org-element-drag-forward'.
>
> Okay. Will it be easy to bind these to M- etc. to achieve
> consistent behaviour? I.e. does org-metaup know what to do with
> blocks?
I hope that, one day, they will replace current `org-metaup'
Sebastien Vauban writes:
[...]
> Personally, I dislike using headlines for *anything* that's in the frame. I
> like the idea that headlines do show the structure of your presentation:
>
> - (optionally) sections and subsections for the sidebar
> - frame title (and subtitle)
>
> and no more.
Thi
Hi all,
Greg Tucker-Kellogg wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>>> Eric S Fraga writes:
>>>
Well, I will have to chime in with a contrary view. I like using
headlines to define blocks, and I use blocks on almost every frame. I
hav
I also quite like using headlines for blocks, for many of the same reasons Eric
mentioned. In addition, I regularly use column view to set BEAMER_env,
BEAMER_envargs, BEAMER_extra, etc., and column view operates on headlines.
Greg
On Jun 20, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Nicolas G
Hello,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Well, I will have to chime in with a contrary view. I like using
> headlines to define blocks, and I use blocks on almost every frame. I
> have the following reasons for preferring a headline approach:
>
> - the proposed approach does not easily (at all?) cater fo
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Avdi Grimm writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:41 PM, suvayu ali
>> wrote:
>>
>>> With this syntax it would be very easy to write both really long (40-50
>>> frames) as well as quick and short presentations.
>>>
>>
>> I've onl
"Sebastien Vauban"
> IIUC, you seem to say it's difficult to use the overlay notation, but
> you can
> use it very easily that way:
> ** Overlay effects \\ Keep the suspense!
>
> *** Time bomb:B_block:
> :PROPERTIES:
> :BEAMER_env: blo
Hello Rasmus,
Rasmus wrote:
> - Operating with pauses are overly hard. One can specify overlays in
>properties, but is just not very convenient, as I may have to
>introduce a new number j'natural' in the current org-beamer (IMO).
I certainly will put my grain of salt later on, but
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> As I announced in another thread, I'm starting a Beamer back-end for
> the new export engine.
This is indeed good news.
Here are some concerns that I would like to address compared to the
current exporter.
- Operating with pauses are overly hard. One can specify ov
Avdi Grimm writes:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:41 PM, suvayu ali
> wrote:
>
>> With this syntax it would be very easy to write both really long (40-50
>> frames) as well as quick and short presentations.
>>
>
> I've only been using Org and Beamer for a little while, but if I understand
> it co
Hi Nicolas,
first of all, I think the block idea is a good one, as long a notes will
remain headlines. Nevertheless I often had the problem in my documents,
that I wanted to insert code between frames. It would be great, if you
could provide a clean solution for such things, too. (ignoreheading
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:41 PM, suvayu ali
wrote:
> With this syntax it would be very easy to write both really long (40-50
> frames) as well as quick and short presentations.
>
I've only been using Org and Beamer for a little while, but if I understand
it correctly this sounds preferable.
I
Hi Nicolas,
First a big thank you for all your efforts over the last year.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if it is really interesting to have every environment set
> up from headlines. I understand it allows to use column view but, from
> my experience,
Hello,
As I announced in another thread, I'm starting a Beamer back-end for the
new export engine. Though, before I start hacking, I have a question
about environments.
I'm wondering if it is really interesting to have every environment set
up from headlines. I understand it allows to use column
24 matches
Mail list logo
