Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte writes:
>>
>> I agree completely. So my question boils down to this feature request:
>>
>> Now, that #+call lines can be named, would it be possible to reference
>> the results the same way as for code blocks?
>>
>
> I just pushed up a commit which should make this possibl
>
> I agree completely. So my question boils down to this feature request:
>
> Now, that #+call lines can be named, would it be possible to reference
> the results the same way as for code blocks?
>
I just pushed up a commit which should make this possible. E.g.,
* call by name
#+name: echo-in
Hi Sebastien,
"Sebastien Vauban"
writes:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Leha wrote:
>> "Sebastien Vauban" writes:
>>> Andreas Leha wrote:
how do I reference the results of a #+call line?
Here are my unsuccessful attempts:
* Test call results
#+name: curdir
#+b
