Hello,
I just ran `org-test-run-all-tests' in my active WinNT Emacs session
(with Org-mode release_8.3beta-677-g0497e3), and was surprised by the
high number of failures:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
Selector: "\\(org\\|ob\\)"
Passed: 332
Failed: 63 (53 unex
Hello,
Sebastien Vauban
writes:
> I just ran `org-test-run-all-tests' in my active WinNT Emacs session
> (with Org-mode release_8.3beta-677-g0497e3), and was surprised by the
> high number of failures:
You probably heavily customized Org, and many tests expect default
values for defcustoms to
Hello,
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>
>> I just ran `org-test-run-all-tests' in my active WinNT Emacs session
>> (with Org-mode release_8.3beta-677-g0497e3), and was surprised by the
>> high number of failures:
>
> You probably heavily customized Org
For sure ;-)
> and many
Sebastien Vauban wrote:
> Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>>
>>> I just ran `org-test-run-all-tests' in my active WinNT Emacs session
>>> (with Org-mode release_8.3beta-677-g0497e3), and was surprised by
>>> the high number of failures:
>>
>> You probably heavily customized Org
>
Sebastien Vauban
writes:
> Or even more sense: calling `org-babel-execute-maybe' instead?
I think it would be better, yes. There is no point in testing
`org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c' in "test-ob.el".
Regards,
Hello Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>
>> I just ran `org-test-run-all-tests' in my active WinNT Emacs session
>> (with Org-mode release_8.3beta-677-g0497e3), and was surprised by the
>> high number of failures:
>
> You probably heavily customized Org, and many tests ex
Sebastien Vauban
writes:
> Did I misunderstand the change of last year (Dec '13) or should `sh'
> language be abandoned in favor of `shell'?
I think you're right.
> IIUC, then, those blocks should be updated:
[...]
> And those inline calls as well:
[...]
> I am willing to make the patch.
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>
>> Did I misunderstand the change of last year (Dec '13) or should `sh'
>> language be abandoned in favor of `shell'?
>
> I think you're right.
>
>> IIUC, then, those blocks should be updated: ...
>> And those inline calls as well: ...
>> I am wil
Sebastien Vauban
writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>>
>>> Did I misunderstand the change of last year (Dec '13) or should `sh'
>>> language be abandoned in favor of `shell'?
>>
>> I think you're right.
>>
>>> IIUC, then, those blocks should be updated: ...
>>> And those
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>> Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>>> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>>>
Did I misunderstand the change of last year (Dec '13) or should `sh'
language be abandoned in favor of `shell'?
>>>
>>> I think you're right.
>>>
IIUC, then, those blocks shou
Sebastien Vauban
writes:
> Here is a patch you can apply with no problem -- just checked it on
> a fresh copy of master.
Thanks.
I can apply it but it introduces test failures.
FAILED ob-shell/generic-uses-no-arrays
FAILED ob-shell/generic-uses-no-assoc-arrays
FAILED ob-tangle/co
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>
>> Here is a patch you can apply with no problem -- just checked it on
>> a fresh copy of master.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I can apply it but it introduces test failures.
>
>FAILED ob-shell/generic-uses-no-arrays
>FAILED ob-shell/generic-uses-n
12 matches
Mail list logo
