On Jun 14, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Jun 10, 2011, at 11:05 AM, David Edmondson wrote:
>
>> * carsten.domi...@gmail.com [2011-06-10 Fri 09:20]
>>> Hi, I need a few testers: Something very strange is going on here.
>>>
>>> When I evaluate this form
>>>
>>> (
Hi David,
On Jun 10, 2011, at 11:05 AM, David Edmondson wrote:
> * carsten.domi...@gmail.com [2011-06-10 Fri 09:20]
>> Hi, I need a few testers: Something very strange is going on here.
>>
>> When I evaluate this form
>>
>> (decode-time (days-to-time (time-to-days (current-time
>>
>> I ge
G'day Carsten (and the others who've latched onto this issue),
When I first saw the thread dealing with decode-time ... I frankly had no idea
how this related to the issue I'd reported. However, a few things have become
clearer to me and perhaps what I see may help.
Here is what I see on:
GNU
Hi Carsten
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:20, Carsten Dominik
wrote:
> When I evaluate this form
> (decode-time (days-to-time (time-to-days (current-time
> I get a date in the year 3980. I think this used to work.
> Is there anyone who has an idea what is going on here?
Same here (except the "I
Achim Gratz wrote:
> (version)
> "GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (i586-suse-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.22.1)
> of 2011-06-07 on build40"
>
> (current-time)
> (19954 27377 237772)
> (time-to-days (current-time))
> 734298
> (days-to-time (time-to-days (current-time)))
> (968068 42752)
> ^^
> this doesn't f
Carsten Dominik writes:
> When I evaluate this form
>
> (decode-time (days-to-time (time-to-days (current-time
>
>
> I get a date in the year 3980. I think this used to work.
> Is there anyone who has an idea what is going on here?
If I evaluate this form in the scratch buffer (no org-mode
* carsten.domi...@gmail.com [2011-06-10 Fri 09:20]
> Hi, I need a few testers: Something very strange is going on here.
>
> When I evaluate this form
>
> (decode-time (days-to-time (time-to-days (current-time
>
> I get a date in the year 3980. I think this used to work.
> Is there anyone who
Hi, I need a few testers: Something very strange is going on here.
When I evaluate this form
(decode-time (days-to-time (time-to-days (current-time
I get a date in the year 3980. I think this used to work.
Is there anyone who has an idea what is going on here?
Thanks
- Carsten
On Jun 4
Robert Cunningham writes:
> for a few weeks now, and including the git commit
> af677f6d0667bacba72defeaee7e76557e68f8c8 that I last tested, the Agenda Bulk
> Scatter (BS) has had a bug whereby items it reschedules have the DATE lost.
Please, please, if you'd like to get your bug fixed, provid
for a few weeks now, and including the git commit
af677f6d0667bacba72defeaee7e76557e68f8c8 that I last tested, the Agenda Bulk
Scatter (BS) has had a bug whereby items it reschedules have the DATE lost.
As an example
SCHEDULED 2011-12-12
ends up as
SCHEDULED
after BS
org-mode 7.5 did not h
10 matches
Mail list logo
