Andrea Rossetti andrea.rosse...@gmail.com writes:
PS: Are you using Calc regularly?
Compact answer: no :(
Detailed answer: I do like Calc and Org+Babel+Calc,
but my daily job doesn't involve any maths.
Then it's understandable, the UI of Calc is very fast but also very,
very abstract.
My
Hi Dieter,
die...@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:
PS: Are you using Calc regularly?
Compact answer: no :(
Detailed answer: I do like Calc and Org+Babel+Calc,
but my daily job doesn't involve any maths.
The Org functions I use most frequently are:
- org-clock-in,
Hello Andrea 8-)
Andrea Rossetti andrea.rosse...@gmail.com writes:
Andrea Rossetti andrea.rosse...@gmail.com writes:
3) temporary workaround: try to change :var v=3 into :var var-v=3,
it works for me, does it work for you too?
The suggested workaround/test is: replace
#+BEGIN_SRC calc :var
Andrea Rossetti andrea.rosse...@gmail.com writes:
3) temporary workaround: try to change :var v=3 into :var var-v=3,
it works for me, does it work for you too?
I'm afraid I've been a bit cryptic here.
The suggested workaround/test is: replace
#+BEGIN_SRC calc :var v=3
v + 4
#+END_SRC
with
die...@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes:
But now we are getting: byte-code: Symbol's function definition is void:
v!
#+BEGIN_SRC calc :var v=3
v + 4
#+END_SRC
Hello Dieter, I think I got it!
1) I see the same error message as you see, for variables with
name v or var
2)
Hello Orgers,
please consider: Emacs -Q and evaluate the following
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
(org-babel-do-load-languages
'org-babel-load-languages
'((calc . t)
(emacs-lisp . t)
))
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS:
| (calc . t) | (emacs-lisp . t) |
The following works as expected
#+BEGIN_SRC calc
