Hello,
Coleman Gariety writes:
> I agree. However, in specialized fields (linguistics and philosophy, for
> example), single quotation marks are commonly used to refer to technical
> terms or specialized uses of words
>
Nicolas,
Thank you for your response.
> When you need that level of precision, smart quotes are not for you.
I agree. However, in specialized fields (linguistics and philosophy, for
example), single quotation marks are commonly used to refer to technical
terms or specialized uses of words
Hello,
Coleman Gariety writes:
> Also, it occurs to me that one can make use of single quotation marks as
> primary quotes when mentioning a word without using it. Moreover, when
> italics and double quotation marks are also present, the use of single
> quotations as primary is necessary.
>
>
Nicolas,
Thank you for your response. I now see that I had misunderstood the
documentation.
Also, it occurs to me that one can make use of single quotation marks as
primary quotes when mentioning a word without using it. Moreover, when
italics and double quotation marks are also present, the use
Hello,
Coleman Gariety writes:
> According to documentation (org-export-with-smart-quotes) should treat
> "pairs of single quotes as secondary quotes." This text:
Only within primary quotes! If there are no primary quotes around, you
don't need a second level of quotation, and single quotes
According to documentation (org-export-with-smart-quotes) should treat
"pairs of single quotes as secondary quotes." This text:
'foo'
Should be exported to HTML as:
foo
However, org-mode 9.1.14 exports this text as:
foo
This does not occur when a secondary pair of quotations occurs within a
