Hi guys,
Looks like I just reported the exact same bug few minutes back.
@Rasmus: Are you still working on committing the fix for this?
Thanks.
Kaushal
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:42 PM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Rasmus writes:
>
> > With the
Hello,
Rasmus writes:
> With the attached patch ox-latex seems to behave in this way.
Thank you. Some comments follow.
> Though perhaps there’s a more efficient way to get the first
> footnote-reference to a given definition than trawling through with
>
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> Could we inject labels in all footnotes? If so we could simply use
>>
>>\textsuperscript{\ref{FN-LABEL}}
>>
>> In place of
>>
>>\footnotemark[FN-GUESS]{}
>>
>> It seems \footref of scrextend.sty has
Rasmus writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> Rasmus writes:
>>
>>> Could we inject labels in all footnotes? If so we could simply use
>>>
>>>\textsuperscript{\ref{FN-LABEL}}
>>>
>>> In place of
>>>
>>>\footnotemark[FN-GUESS]{}
>>>
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> Could we inject labels in all footnotes? If so we could simply use
>>
>>\textsuperscript{\ref{FN-LABEL}}
>>
>> In place of
>>
>>\footnotemark[FN-GUESS]{}
>>
>> It seems \footref of scrextend.sty has
Rasmus writes:
> Could we inject labels in all footnotes? If so we could simply use
>
>\textsuperscript{\ref{FN-LABEL}}
>
> In place of
>
>\footnotemark[FN-GUESS]{}
>
> It seems \footref of scrextend.sty has some extra robustness built into it
> but until someone
Hi,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> The transcoded version of the second "[fn:1]", say S2, will be passed to
>> our filter FUN, if FUN is added to
>> org-export-filter-footnote-reference-functions. But S2 will only contain
>> the estimated
Rasmus writes:
> The transcoded version of the second "[fn:1]", say S2, will be passed to
> our filter FUN, if FUN is added to
> org-export-filter-footnote-reference-functions. But S2 will only contain
> the estimated number of the footnote¹, e.g. "\footnotemark[1]{}".
Indeed.
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> Ultimately, I think a decent fix would be to add a prefix to
>> org-latex--label for targets pointing to footnotes. They should be
>> prefixed with "fn:". Then, it should be easy to hack together
Hello,
Rasmus writes:
> Ultimately, I think a decent fix would be to add a prefix to
> org-latex--label for targets pointing to footnotes. They should be
> prefixed with "fn:". Then, it should be easy to hack together
> a filter.
OOC, isn't
Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto writes:
> Line1.[fn:1]
>
> \pagebreak
>
> Line2.[fn:1]
> * Footnotes
> [fn:1] Footnote.
>
> In the generated PDF, the second footnote reference (on page 2) is not
>
Export the following Org file to PDF:
Line1.[fn:1]
\pagebreak
Line2.[fn:1]
* Footnotes
[fn:1] Footnote.
In the generated PDF, the second footnote
12 matches
Mail list logo