Re: [O] C-c ! org-time-stamp-inactive ?

Nicolas Goaziou nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > > Hello, > > K limist.com> writes: > > > Kyle Meyer kyleam.com> writes: > > > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> Luke Crook balooga.com> writes: > >> > >> > For me, C-c ! has suddenly become unbound and no longer inserts > >> > an inactive timestamp.

Re: [O] C-c ! org-time-stamp-inactive ?

Hello, K writes: > Kyle Meyer kyleam.com> writes: > >> >> Hello, >> >> Luke Crook balooga.com> writes: >> >> > For me, C-c ! has suddenly become unbound and no longer inserts >> > an inactive timestamp. Has this changed in the base org-mode, or >> > most likely is this

Re: [O] C-c ! org-time-stamp-inactive ?

K writes: > I've run into the same problem, with both Org 8.3.4 and MELPA version > 20160307, the usual C-c ! doesn't work anymore for inserting inactive > timestamp. If there's been no change to the default binding, any > suggestions on how to debug this please? Thanks! I'd

Re: [O] C-c ! org-time-stamp-inactive ?

Kyle Meyer kyleam.com> writes: > > Hello, > > Luke Crook balooga.com> writes: > > > For me, C-c ! has suddenly become unbound and no longer inserts > > an inactive timestamp. Has this changed in the base org-mode, or > > most likely is this an issue with my setup? > > The default binding

Re: [O] C-c ! org-time-stamp-inactive ?

Hello, Luke Crook writes: > For me, C-c ! has suddenly become unbound and no longer inserts > an inactive timestamp. Has this changed in the base org-mode, or > most likely is this an issue with my setup? The default binding hasn't been changed in Org. -- Kyle

[O] C-c ! org-time-stamp-inactive ?

For me, C-c ! has suddenly become unbound and no longer inserts an inactive timestamp. Has this changed in the base org-mode, or most likely is this an issue with my setup? Thanks.