Hi James,
sorry, I copied the wrong function's name and my message was wrong.
What I meant is this: you need to call `org-sort-list-by-checkbox-type'
*directly* on the list you want to sort -- not after `C-c ^ f'.
`C-c ^ f org-sort-list-by-checkbox-type RET' will end up in loop because
org-sort-
On Dec 29, 2012 1:40 AM, "Bastien" wrote:
> >
> > 1. C-c ^ f org-sort-list-by-checkbox-type
> > 2. This puts the done items at the top, which I didn't want, so... C-c
^ F org-
> > sort-list-by-checkbox-type.
> > 3. Emacs goes into a tailspin (recovered by C-g).
>
> `org-list-get-item-end-before-bl
Hi James,
James Harkins writes:
> I finally had a chance to play with this -- works nicely, except I managed to
> get emacs into an infinite loop this way:
>
> 1. C-c ^ f org-sort-list-by-checkbox-type
> 2. This puts the done items at the top, which I didn't want, so... C-c ^ F
> org-
> sort-l
Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes:
> Playing with this idea I noticed that the sorting function
> did not accept their additional arguments like sorting-key
> and get key-function in they way they should. So I patched
> them, to make the following work in the current master:
>
> (defun org-sort
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I would think that
>
> checked - transitionary - unchecked - no box
>
> is a pretty decent default.
+1
> (defun org-sort-list-by-checkbox-type ()
> "Sort list items according to Checkbox state."
> (interactive)
> (org-sort-list
>nil ?f
>(lambda
James Harkins writes:
> But I'm running into the limitation that plain lists can't be sorted
> *by their checklist status*. You can sort alphabetically, numerically
> or by time or function.
Hi, Org people.
Just quickly perusing this list, this message reminds me of an old
annoyance in Org sor
On 8.10.2012, at 20:25, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> James Harkins writes:
>
>> I've started to like checklists because they are a good way to keep
>> account of things that have to be done, without the individual items
>> being entered into the agenda (and thus transferred to MobileOrg
On Oct 9, 2012 2:29 AM, "Nicolas Goaziou" wrote:
> There are four states: checked box, unchecked box, transitory box and no
> box at all. I can't see an order that should be prevalent over others.
Fair enough, thanks. I'll check the org manual later to see if the format
of the function is documen
Hello,
James Harkins writes:
> I've started to like checklists because they are a good way to keep
> account of things that have to be done, without the individual items
> being entered into the agenda (and thus transferred to MobileOrg).
>
> But I'm running into the limitation that plain lists
I've started to like checklists because they are a good way to keep account of
things that have to be done, without the individual items being entered into
the agenda (and thus transferred to MobileOrg).
But I'm running into the limitation that plain lists can't be sorted *by their
checklist st
10 matches
Mail list logo
