Hi James,
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
I finally had a chance to play with this -- works nicely, except I managed to
get emacs into an infinite loop this way:
1. C-c ^ f org-sort-list-by-checkbox-type
2. This puts the done items at the top, which I didn't want, so... C-c ^ F
On Dec 29, 2012 1:40 AM, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
1. C-c ^ f org-sort-list-by-checkbox-type
2. This puts the done items at the top, which I didn't want, so... C-c
^ F org-
sort-list-by-checkbox-type.
3. Emacs goes into a tailspin (recovered by C-g).
Hi James,
sorry, I copied the wrong function's name and my message was wrong.
What I meant is this: you need to call `org-sort-list-by-checkbox-type'
*directly* on the list you want to sort -- not after `C-c ^ f'.
`C-c ^ f org-sort-list-by-checkbox-type RET' will end up in loop because
Carsten Dominik carsten.dominik at gmail.com writes:
Playing with this idea I noticed that the sorting function
did not accept their additional arguments like sorting-key
and get key-function in they way they should. So I patched
them, to make the following work in the current master:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
I would think that
checked - transitionary - unchecked - no box
is a pretty decent default.
+1
(defun org-sort-list-by-checkbox-type ()
Sort list items according to Checkbox state.
(interactive)
(org-sort-list
nil
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
But I'm running into the limitation that plain lists can't be sorted
*by their checklist status*. You can sort alphabetically, numerically
or by time or function.
Hi, Org people.
Just quickly perusing this list, this message reminds me of an old
On 8.10.2012, at 20:25, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
I've started to like checklists because they are a good way to keep
account of things that have to be done, without the individual items
being entered into the agenda (and thus transferred
I've started to like checklists because they are a good way to keep account of
things that have to be done, without the individual items being entered into
the agenda (and thus transferred to MobileOrg).
But I'm running into the limitation that plain lists can't be sorted *by their
checklist
On Oct 9, 2012 2:29 AM, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote:
There are four states: checked box, unchecked box, transitory box and no
box at all. I can't see an order that should be prevalent over others.
Fair enough, thanks. I'll check the org manual later to see if the format
of the
