Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> I rebased wip-cite onto master. I didn't test the branch but "make test"
> reports no problem.
Great, thanks!
I guess this does not include the preliminary work on the org-cite
library (from Aaron Ecay's wip-cite-awe branch), or
Hello,
Richard Lawrence writes:
> Matt Price writes:
>
>> Richard, is wip-cite up to date with recent git versions of org-mode?
>
> Nope. At least, I have not done any work on this, and I don't know of
> anyone else who has either. I suppose
Hi Matt,
Matt Price writes:
> Richard, is wip-cite up to date with recent git versions of org-mode?
Nope. At least, I have not done any work on this, and I don't know of
anyone else who has either. I suppose I should rebase it onto master
again, but it's hard to justify
Richard, is wip-cite up to date with recent git versions of org-mode? I'd
like ot try it out but would rather not go back to a pre-9.0 version or
org, having done a certain amount of work to update to the new framework...
Thanks!
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Julian M. Burgos
This is very interesting! I will give it a try. Thanks for the heads up.
Richard Lawrence writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> With Org 9.0 out, I thought it might be a good time to revisit the issue
> of citation syntax. Not much has happened with this recently, but I do
> have one bit of progress to
Hi everyone,
With Org 9.0 out, I thought it might be a good time to revisit the issue
of citation syntax. Not much has happened with this recently, but I do
have one bit of progress to report:
About six months ago, Albert Krewinkel, who maintains the support for Org
syntax in Pandoc [1], wrote